YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Intercomparison of Isentropic Trajectories over the South Atlantic

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1994:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 005::page 864
    Author:
    Pickering, Kenneth E.
    ,
    Thompson, Anne M.
    ,
    McNamara, Donna P.
    ,
    Schoeberl, Mark R.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0864:AIOITO>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The authors have compared isentropic trajectories computed from meteorological fields from different analysis centers. The analysis was performed for the South Atlantic, where a springtime maximum in tropospheric ozone has sparked considerable interest in the transport meteorology. Using the model of Schoeberl et al., isentropic forward trajectories were computed from an array of points over southern Africa and backward trajectories from an array of points over the South Atlantic. The model was run for an 8-day period in October 1989 with input taken from the twice-daily global gridded data fields from the National Meteorological Center (NMC) and from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (BCMWF). There were large differences between the trajectories based on the two fields in terms of travel distance, horizontal separation, and vertical separation. Best comparisons for individual trajectories were found in the low-latitude easterlies, and the poorest comparisons were found in the westerlies and in the vicinity of the center of the South Atlantic subtropical anticyclone. Significant differences in wind speeds between the two analyses also led to large trajectory differences. Trajectories were also computed using once-daily NMC fields. The effect of this degradation of the data was small. Trajectories computed from balanced winds computed from the NMC geopotential height and temperature fields showed the largest differences when compared with the ECMWF trajectories. The balanced wind fields should not be used in trajectory construction in the tropical lower troposphere. It is difficult to make a definitive recommendation concerning which set of fields should be used in future transport analysts in this region due to the very large trajectory differences found in this analysis and the lack of any independent verification data. Any extensive analysis of transport in this region should be done only in conjunction with considerable additional data collection.
    • Download: (1.312Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Intercomparison of Isentropic Trajectories over the South Atlantic

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4203259
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPickering, Kenneth E.
    contributor authorThompson, Anne M.
    contributor authorMcNamara, Donna P.
    contributor authorSchoeberl, Mark R.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:09:52Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:09:52Z
    date copyright1994/05/01
    date issued1994
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-62374.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4203259
    description abstractThe authors have compared isentropic trajectories computed from meteorological fields from different analysis centers. The analysis was performed for the South Atlantic, where a springtime maximum in tropospheric ozone has sparked considerable interest in the transport meteorology. Using the model of Schoeberl et al., isentropic forward trajectories were computed from an array of points over southern Africa and backward trajectories from an array of points over the South Atlantic. The model was run for an 8-day period in October 1989 with input taken from the twice-daily global gridded data fields from the National Meteorological Center (NMC) and from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (BCMWF). There were large differences between the trajectories based on the two fields in terms of travel distance, horizontal separation, and vertical separation. Best comparisons for individual trajectories were found in the low-latitude easterlies, and the poorest comparisons were found in the westerlies and in the vicinity of the center of the South Atlantic subtropical anticyclone. Significant differences in wind speeds between the two analyses also led to large trajectory differences. Trajectories were also computed using once-daily NMC fields. The effect of this degradation of the data was small. Trajectories computed from balanced winds computed from the NMC geopotential height and temperature fields showed the largest differences when compared with the ECMWF trajectories. The balanced wind fields should not be used in trajectory construction in the tropical lower troposphere. It is difficult to make a definitive recommendation concerning which set of fields should be used in future transport analysts in this region due to the very large trajectory differences found in this analysis and the lack of any independent verification data. Any extensive analysis of transport in this region should be done only in conjunction with considerable additional data collection.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAn Intercomparison of Isentropic Trajectories over the South Atlantic
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume122
    journal issue5
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<0864:AIOITO>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage864
    journal lastpage879
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1994:;volume( 122 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian