YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Cloud-to-Ground Lightning in a Tornadic Storm on 8 May 1986

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1990:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 007::page 1557
    Author:
    MacGorman, Donald R.
    ,
    Nielsen, Kurt E.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<1557:CTGLIA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: On 8 May 1986, the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) collected Doppler radar and lightning ground strike data on a supercell storm that produced three tornadoes, including an F3 tornado in Edmond, Oklahoma, approximately 40 km north of NSSL. The Edmond storm formed 30 km ahead of a storm complex and produced its first and most damaging tornado just as the storm complex began to overtake it from the west. In the mesocyclone that spawned the tornado, low-level cyclonic shear peaked as the first tornado dissipated and a second tornado began. As low-level cyclonic shear initially increased, negative cloud-to-ground lightning flash rates also increased, reaching a peak of 11 min?1 a few minutes after the peak in cyclonic shear. During this period lightning strike locations tended to concentrate just north of the mesocyclone, near and inside a 50-dBZ reflectivity core. As cyclonic shear decreased from its peak during and after the second tornado, negative ground flash rates also decreased, and strike locations became more scattered. Positive ground flashes began just before the storm became tornadic, and positive flash rates peaked during the tornadic stage of the storm. The evolution of cloud-to-ground lightning in the Edmond storm differed considerably from the evolution of lightning in the Binger tornadic storm of 22 May 1981 that was studied previously. In the Binger storm, ground flash rates were negatively correlated with cyclonic shear and peaked 15?20 min later than low-level shear and intracloud lightning. It is suggested that the very strong mesocyclone and updraft in the Binger storm enhanced intracloud flash production and delayed ground flashes by causing the initial height of negative charge to be higher than in most storms. It is also suggested that weaker updrafts and a weaker, shallower mesocyclone in the Edmond storm resulted in higher negative ground flash rates when the Edmond mesocyclone was still strong, because negative charge near the mesocyclone was at the lower heights common to most thunderstorms.
    • Download: (1.794Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Cloud-to-Ground Lightning in a Tornadic Storm on 8 May 1986

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4202628
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMacGorman, Donald R.
    contributor authorNielsen, Kurt E.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:08:20Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:08:20Z
    date copyright1991/07/01
    date issued1990
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-61806.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4202628
    description abstractOn 8 May 1986, the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL) collected Doppler radar and lightning ground strike data on a supercell storm that produced three tornadoes, including an F3 tornado in Edmond, Oklahoma, approximately 40 km north of NSSL. The Edmond storm formed 30 km ahead of a storm complex and produced its first and most damaging tornado just as the storm complex began to overtake it from the west. In the mesocyclone that spawned the tornado, low-level cyclonic shear peaked as the first tornado dissipated and a second tornado began. As low-level cyclonic shear initially increased, negative cloud-to-ground lightning flash rates also increased, reaching a peak of 11 min?1 a few minutes after the peak in cyclonic shear. During this period lightning strike locations tended to concentrate just north of the mesocyclone, near and inside a 50-dBZ reflectivity core. As cyclonic shear decreased from its peak during and after the second tornado, negative ground flash rates also decreased, and strike locations became more scattered. Positive ground flashes began just before the storm became tornadic, and positive flash rates peaked during the tornadic stage of the storm. The evolution of cloud-to-ground lightning in the Edmond storm differed considerably from the evolution of lightning in the Binger tornadic storm of 22 May 1981 that was studied previously. In the Binger storm, ground flash rates were negatively correlated with cyclonic shear and peaked 15?20 min later than low-level shear and intracloud lightning. It is suggested that the very strong mesocyclone and updraft in the Binger storm enhanced intracloud flash production and delayed ground flashes by causing the initial height of negative charge to be higher than in most storms. It is also suggested that weaker updrafts and a weaker, shallower mesocyclone in the Edmond storm resulted in higher negative ground flash rates when the Edmond mesocyclone was still strong, because negative charge near the mesocyclone was at the lower heights common to most thunderstorms.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleCloud-to-Ground Lightning in a Tornadic Storm on 8 May 1986
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume119
    journal issue7
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1991)119<1557:CTGLIA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1557
    journal lastpage1574
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1990:;volume( 119 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian