YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Objective and Subjective Precipitation Probability Forecasts: The Sufficiency Relation

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1990:;volume( 118 ):;issue: 009::page 1783
    Author:
    Murphy, Allan H.
    ,
    Ye, Qian
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1783:COOASP>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: In this paper the sufficiency relation is used to compare objective and subjective probability of precipitation (PoP) forecasts. The theoretical significance of the sufficiency relation in comparative evaluation arises from the fact that if it can be shown that forecasting system A is sufficient for forecasting system B, then A's forecasts are necessarily of higher quality and greater value to all users than B's forecasts. However, since the sufficiency relation is an incomplete order (it is not always possible to show that system A is sufficient for system B, or vice versa), the practical significance of this relation warrants further investigation. An operational method of comparing forecasting systems using the sufficiency relation has recently been described in the forecasting literature. This method involves the construction of a so-called forecast sufficiency characteristic (FSC) for each forecasting system, based on a representative set of forecasts and observations. In terms of this characterization, system A is sufficient for system B if A's FSC is superior to B's FSC. Objective and subjective PoP forecasts for six National Weather Service offices are compared here in terms of their respective FSCs. Sufficiency was found in only two of the 24 cases defined by various combinations of forecast office, season, and lead time. In these two cases, both involving 12?24 hour forecasts, the subjective forecasts were sufficient for the objective forecasts. Several other cases exhibited a condition described as "almost sufficient,? but caution must be exercised in drawing conclusions regarding the relative quality and/or relative value of forecasts in such cases. Comparison of the FSCs of PoP forecasts and the FSCs of categorical forecasts derived from the PoP forecasts reveals that, as expected, the former are always superior to the latter. The implications of these results for comparative evaluation of weather forecasting systems are discussed and some possible extensions of this work are identified.
    • Download: (711.8Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Objective and Subjective Precipitation Probability Forecasts: The Sufficiency Relation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4202452
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMurphy, Allan H.
    contributor authorYe, Qian
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:07:56Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:07:56Z
    date copyright1990/09/01
    date issued1990
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-61648.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4202452
    description abstractIn this paper the sufficiency relation is used to compare objective and subjective probability of precipitation (PoP) forecasts. The theoretical significance of the sufficiency relation in comparative evaluation arises from the fact that if it can be shown that forecasting system A is sufficient for forecasting system B, then A's forecasts are necessarily of higher quality and greater value to all users than B's forecasts. However, since the sufficiency relation is an incomplete order (it is not always possible to show that system A is sufficient for system B, or vice versa), the practical significance of this relation warrants further investigation. An operational method of comparing forecasting systems using the sufficiency relation has recently been described in the forecasting literature. This method involves the construction of a so-called forecast sufficiency characteristic (FSC) for each forecasting system, based on a representative set of forecasts and observations. In terms of this characterization, system A is sufficient for system B if A's FSC is superior to B's FSC. Objective and subjective PoP forecasts for six National Weather Service offices are compared here in terms of their respective FSCs. Sufficiency was found in only two of the 24 cases defined by various combinations of forecast office, season, and lead time. In these two cases, both involving 12?24 hour forecasts, the subjective forecasts were sufficient for the objective forecasts. Several other cases exhibited a condition described as "almost sufficient,? but caution must be exercised in drawing conclusions regarding the relative quality and/or relative value of forecasts in such cases. Comparison of the FSCs of PoP forecasts and the FSCs of categorical forecasts derived from the PoP forecasts reveals that, as expected, the former are always superior to the latter. The implications of these results for comparative evaluation of weather forecasting systems are discussed and some possible extensions of this work are identified.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparison of Objective and Subjective Precipitation Probability Forecasts: The Sufficiency Relation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume118
    journal issue9
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1990)118<1783:COOASP>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1783
    journal lastpage1792
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1990:;volume( 118 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian