YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Land Surface Climatology of the Community Land Model Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2002:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 022::page 3123
    Author:
    Bonan, Gordon B.
    ,
    Oleson, Keith W.
    ,
    Vertenstein, Mariana
    ,
    Levis, Samuel
    ,
    Zeng, Xubin
    ,
    Dai, Yongjiu
    ,
    Dickinson, Robert E.
    ,
    Yang, Zong-Liang
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3123:TLSCOT>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The land surface parameterization used with the community climate model (CCM3) and the climate system model (CSM1), the National Center for Atmospheric Research land surface model (NCAR LSM1), has been modified as part of the development of the next version of these climate models. This new model is known as the community land model (CLM2). In CLM2, the surface is represented by five primary subgrid land cover types (glacier, lake, wetland, urban, vegetated) in each grid cell. The vegetated portion of a grid cell is further divided into patches of up to 4 of 16 plant functional types, each with its own leaf and stem area index and canopy height. The relative area of each subgrid unit, the plant functional type, and leaf area index are obtained from 1-km satellite data. The soil texture dataset allows vertical profiles of sand and clay. Most of the physical parameterizations in the model were also updated. Major model differences include: 10 layers for soil temperature and soil water with explicit treatment of liquid water and ice; a multilayer snowpack; runoff based on the TOPMODEL concept; new formulation of ground and vegetation fluxes; and vertical root profiles from a global synthesis of ecological studies. Simulations with CCM3 show significant improvements in surface air temperature, snow cover, and runoff for CLM2 compared to LSM1. CLM2 generally warms surface air temperature in all seasons compared to LSM1, reducing or eliminating many cold biases. Annual precipitation over land is reduced from 2.35 mm day?1 in LSM1 to 2.14 mm day?1 in CLM2. The hydrologic cycle is also different. Transpiration and ground evaporation are reduced. Leaves and stems evaporate more intercepted water annually in CLM2 than LSM1. Global runoff from land increases from 0.75 mm day?1 in LSM1 to 0.84 mm day?1 in CLM2. The annual cycle of runoff is greatly improved in CLM2, especially in arctic and boreal regions where the model has low runoff in cold seasons when the soil is frozen and high runoff during the snowmelt season. Most of the differences between CLM2 and LSM1 are attributed to particular parameterizations rather than to different surface datasets. Important processes include: multilayer snow, frozen water, interception, soil water limitation to latent heat, and higher aerodynamic resistances to heat exchange from ground.
    • Download: (1.872Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The Land Surface Climatology of the Community Land Model Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4202345
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBonan, Gordon B.
    contributor authorOleson, Keith W.
    contributor authorVertenstein, Mariana
    contributor authorLevis, Samuel
    contributor authorZeng, Xubin
    contributor authorDai, Yongjiu
    contributor authorDickinson, Robert E.
    contributor authorYang, Zong-Liang
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:07:39Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:07:39Z
    date copyright2002/11/01
    date issued2002
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-6155.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4202345
    description abstractThe land surface parameterization used with the community climate model (CCM3) and the climate system model (CSM1), the National Center for Atmospheric Research land surface model (NCAR LSM1), has been modified as part of the development of the next version of these climate models. This new model is known as the community land model (CLM2). In CLM2, the surface is represented by five primary subgrid land cover types (glacier, lake, wetland, urban, vegetated) in each grid cell. The vegetated portion of a grid cell is further divided into patches of up to 4 of 16 plant functional types, each with its own leaf and stem area index and canopy height. The relative area of each subgrid unit, the plant functional type, and leaf area index are obtained from 1-km satellite data. The soil texture dataset allows vertical profiles of sand and clay. Most of the physical parameterizations in the model were also updated. Major model differences include: 10 layers for soil temperature and soil water with explicit treatment of liquid water and ice; a multilayer snowpack; runoff based on the TOPMODEL concept; new formulation of ground and vegetation fluxes; and vertical root profiles from a global synthesis of ecological studies. Simulations with CCM3 show significant improvements in surface air temperature, snow cover, and runoff for CLM2 compared to LSM1. CLM2 generally warms surface air temperature in all seasons compared to LSM1, reducing or eliminating many cold biases. Annual precipitation over land is reduced from 2.35 mm day?1 in LSM1 to 2.14 mm day?1 in CLM2. The hydrologic cycle is also different. Transpiration and ground evaporation are reduced. Leaves and stems evaporate more intercepted water annually in CLM2 than LSM1. Global runoff from land increases from 0.75 mm day?1 in LSM1 to 0.84 mm day?1 in CLM2. The annual cycle of runoff is greatly improved in CLM2, especially in arctic and boreal regions where the model has low runoff in cold seasons when the soil is frozen and high runoff during the snowmelt season. Most of the differences between CLM2 and LSM1 are attributed to particular parameterizations rather than to different surface datasets. Important processes include: multilayer snow, frozen water, interception, soil water limitation to latent heat, and higher aerodynamic resistances to heat exchange from ground.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe Land Surface Climatology of the Community Land Model Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume15
    journal issue22
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3123:TLSCOT>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage3123
    journal lastpage3149
    treeJournal of Climate:;2002:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 022
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian