contributor author | Wigley, T. M. L. | |
contributor author | Raper, S. C. B. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:07:18Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:07:18Z | |
date copyright | 2002/10/01 | |
date issued | 2002 | |
identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
identifier other | ams-6141.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4202190 | |
description abstract | Projections of future warming in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment Report (TAR) are substantially larger than those in the Second Assessment Report (SAR). The reasons for these differences are documented and quantified. Differences are divided into differences in the emissions scenarios and differences in the science (gas cycle, forcing, and climate models). The main source of emissions-related differences in warming is aerosol forcing, primarily due to large differences in SO2 emissions between the SAR and TAR scenarios. For any given emissions scenario, concentration projections based on SAR and TAR science are similar, except for methane at high emissions levels where TAR science leads to substantially lower concentrations. The new (TAR) science leads to slightly lower total forcing and slightly larger warming. At the low end of the warming range the effects of the new science and the new emissions scenarios are roughly equal. At the high end, TAR science has a smaller effect and the main reason for larger TAR warming is the use of a different high-end emissions scenario, primarily changes in SO2 emissions. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Reasons for Larger Warming Projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 15 | |
journal issue | 20 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<2945:RFLWPI>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 2945 | |
journal lastpage | 2952 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;2002:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 020 | |
contenttype | Fulltext | |