| contributor author | Cram, Jennifer M. | |
| contributor author | Pielke, Roger A. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:07:16Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T16:07:16Z | |
| date copyright | 1989/03/01 | |
| date issued | 1989 | |
| identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
| identifier other | ams-61400.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4202176 | |
| description abstract | The geostrophic stream and potential functions of Sangster and the derived flat pressure field of Pielke and Cram are further compared. A simple numerical experiment with an idealized mountain-atmosphere system compares the two methods and their sensitivity to lateral boundary conditions. The flat pressure field of Pielke and Cram is essentially equivalent to the streamfunction of Sangster, although the two methods have different boundary condition formulations and resulting different sensitivities to these boundary conditions. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Further Comparison of Two Synoptic Surface Wind and Pressure Analysis Methods | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 117 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0696:FCOTSS>2.0.CO;2 | |
| journal fristpage | 696 | |
| journal lastpage | 706 | |
| tree | Monthly Weather Review:;1989:;volume( 117 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |