YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Linear Models: Useful Tools to Analyze GCM Results

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1987:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 009::page 1996
    Author:
    Kok, C. J.
    ,
    Opsteegh, J. D.
    ,
    van den Dool, H. M.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1996:LMUTTA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Using a two-level linear, steady state model, we diagnose the 40-day mean response of a GCM to a tropical sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly. The time-mean anomalies produced by the GCM are simulated as linear response to the anomalous hemispheric distributions of latent heating, sensible heating and transient eddy forcing. Also, the anomalous effect of mountains, caused by anomalies in the zonal mean surface wind is taken into account. All anomalies are defined as the difference between perturbation and control runs. For our analysis, we have taken the tropical Atlantic SST anomaly experiment performed by Rowntree. We have compared the linear model's response in temperature at 600 mb and winds at 400 mb with the same anomalous quantities produced by the GCM. The similarity between the time-mean anomalies of the GCM experiment and the linear model's response is very high. The pattern correlation coefficients are between 0.6 and 0.7 in the region between 30°N and 60°N. The response to each of the anomalous forcings separately is positively correlated with the GCM anomaly pattern. The amplitude of the response to anomalous forcing by transient eddies is a factor of two or three larger than the effects of anomalous sensible and latent heating. The anomalous effect of the orography is negligible. Although intended to be a tropical SST anomaly GCM experiment, the difference between control and perturbation runs does not seem to be directly related to tropical heating near the SST anomaly. Instead, most of the forcing of anomalies in the midlatitudes took place in the midlatitudes itself and, in particular, the remote effects of forcing by tropical latent heat sources were minor.
    • Download: (1.001Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Linear Models: Useful Tools to Analyze GCM Results

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4201828
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKok, C. J.
    contributor authorOpsteegh, J. D.
    contributor authorvan den Dool, H. M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:06:27Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:06:27Z
    date copyright1987/09/01
    date issued1987
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-61086.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4201828
    description abstractUsing a two-level linear, steady state model, we diagnose the 40-day mean response of a GCM to a tropical sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly. The time-mean anomalies produced by the GCM are simulated as linear response to the anomalous hemispheric distributions of latent heating, sensible heating and transient eddy forcing. Also, the anomalous effect of mountains, caused by anomalies in the zonal mean surface wind is taken into account. All anomalies are defined as the difference between perturbation and control runs. For our analysis, we have taken the tropical Atlantic SST anomaly experiment performed by Rowntree. We have compared the linear model's response in temperature at 600 mb and winds at 400 mb with the same anomalous quantities produced by the GCM. The similarity between the time-mean anomalies of the GCM experiment and the linear model's response is very high. The pattern correlation coefficients are between 0.6 and 0.7 in the region between 30°N and 60°N. The response to each of the anomalous forcings separately is positively correlated with the GCM anomaly pattern. The amplitude of the response to anomalous forcing by transient eddies is a factor of two or three larger than the effects of anomalous sensible and latent heating. The anomalous effect of the orography is negligible. Although intended to be a tropical SST anomaly GCM experiment, the difference between control and perturbation runs does not seem to be directly related to tropical heating near the SST anomaly. Instead, most of the forcing of anomalies in the midlatitudes took place in the midlatitudes itself and, in particular, the remote effects of forcing by tropical latent heat sources were minor.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleLinear Models: Useful Tools to Analyze GCM Results
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume115
    journal issue9
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1996:LMUTTA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1996
    journal lastpage2008
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1987:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian