YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Chebyshev Spectral Methods for Limited-Area Models. Part II: Shallow Water Model

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1987:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 009::page 1954
    Author:
    Fulton, Scott R.
    ,
    Schubert, Wayne H.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1954:CSMFLA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Chebyshev spectral methods were studied in Part I for the linear advection equation in one dimension. Here we extend these methods to the nonlinear shallow water equations in two dimensions. Numerical models are constructed for a limited domain on a ?-plane, using open (characteristic) boundary conditions based on Rieman invariants to simulate an unbounded domain. Reflecting boundary conditions (wall and balance) are also considered for comparison. We discuss the formulation of the Chebyshev?tau and Chebyshev?collocation discretizations for this problem. The tau discretization avoids aliasing error in evaluating quadratic nonlinear terms, while the collocation method is simpler to program. Numerical results from a linearized one-dimensional test problem demonstrate that with the characteristic boundary conditions the stability properties for various explicit time differencing schemes an essentially the same as obtained in Part I for the linear advection equation. These open boundary conditions also give much more accurate results than the reflecting boundary conditions. In two dimensions, numerical results from the nonlinear models indicate that the Chebyabev?tau discretization should be based on the rotational form of the equations for efficiency, while the Chebyshev?collocation discretization should be based on the advective form for accuracy. Little difference is seen between the tau and collocation solutions for the test cases considered, other than efficiency: with explicit time differencing, the collocation model requires an order of magnitude less computer time.
    • Download: (897.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Chebyshev Spectral Methods for Limited-Area Models. Part II: Shallow Water Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4201826
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFulton, Scott R.
    contributor authorSchubert, Wayne H.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:06:26Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:06:26Z
    date copyright1987/09/01
    date issued1987
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-61084.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4201826
    description abstractChebyshev spectral methods were studied in Part I for the linear advection equation in one dimension. Here we extend these methods to the nonlinear shallow water equations in two dimensions. Numerical models are constructed for a limited domain on a ?-plane, using open (characteristic) boundary conditions based on Rieman invariants to simulate an unbounded domain. Reflecting boundary conditions (wall and balance) are also considered for comparison. We discuss the formulation of the Chebyshev?tau and Chebyshev?collocation discretizations for this problem. The tau discretization avoids aliasing error in evaluating quadratic nonlinear terms, while the collocation method is simpler to program. Numerical results from a linearized one-dimensional test problem demonstrate that with the characteristic boundary conditions the stability properties for various explicit time differencing schemes an essentially the same as obtained in Part I for the linear advection equation. These open boundary conditions also give much more accurate results than the reflecting boundary conditions. In two dimensions, numerical results from the nonlinear models indicate that the Chebyabev?tau discretization should be based on the rotational form of the equations for efficiency, while the Chebyshev?collocation discretization should be based on the advective form for accuracy. Little difference is seen between the tau and collocation solutions for the test cases considered, other than efficiency: with explicit time differencing, the collocation model requires an order of magnitude less computer time.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleChebyshev Spectral Methods for Limited-Area Models. Part II: Shallow Water Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume115
    journal issue9
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1954:CSMFLA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1954
    journal lastpage1965
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1987:;volume( 115 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian