YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The COLA Global Coupled and Anomaly Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere GCM

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2002:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 017::page 2301
    Author:
    Kirtman, Ben P.
    ,
    Fan, Yun
    ,
    Schneider, Edwin K.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<2301:TCGCAA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The Center for Ocean?Land?Atmosphere Studies (COLA) global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean?atmosphere GCM models are described. The ocean and atmosphere components of these coupled models are identical. The only difference between them is in the coupling strategy. The anomaly coupling strategy guarantees that the climatology of the coupled model is close to the observed climatology, whereas the global coupled model suffers from serious climate drift. This climate drift is largest in the eastern tropical Pacific where the coupled model is too warm by as much as 5°C. The climate drift in the coupled model can also be seen by the predominance of an erroneous double intertopical convergence zone (ITCZ) in the eastern tropical Pacific. Despite the climate drift, both models exhibit robust interannual variability in the tropical Pacific. Composite analysis, however, reveals that the characteristics of interannual variability in the coupled and the anomaly coupled models are markedly different. For example, the coupled model exhibits a distinct eastward migration of the ENSO events, whereas the anomaly coupled model is dominated by a standing mode, which is too strongly phase-locked to the annual cycle. Based on diagnostic ocean model simulations, it is shown that an erroneous eastward migration of the annual cycle of thermocline depth and upwelling is responsible for the eastward migration of the ENSO events in the coupled model. The anomaly coupled model has a comparatively weak annual cycle in the thermocline depth and upwelling. These calculations emphasize the importance of correctly simulating the mean state in order to capture realistic ENSO variability.
    • Download: (5.931Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      The COLA Global Coupled and Anomaly Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere GCM

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4201656
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorKirtman, Ben P.
    contributor authorFan, Yun
    contributor authorSchneider, Edwin K.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:06:04Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:06:04Z
    date copyright2002/09/01
    date issued2002
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-6093.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4201656
    description abstractThe Center for Ocean?Land?Atmosphere Studies (COLA) global coupled and anomaly coupled ocean?atmosphere GCM models are described. The ocean and atmosphere components of these coupled models are identical. The only difference between them is in the coupling strategy. The anomaly coupling strategy guarantees that the climatology of the coupled model is close to the observed climatology, whereas the global coupled model suffers from serious climate drift. This climate drift is largest in the eastern tropical Pacific where the coupled model is too warm by as much as 5°C. The climate drift in the coupled model can also be seen by the predominance of an erroneous double intertopical convergence zone (ITCZ) in the eastern tropical Pacific. Despite the climate drift, both models exhibit robust interannual variability in the tropical Pacific. Composite analysis, however, reveals that the characteristics of interannual variability in the coupled and the anomaly coupled models are markedly different. For example, the coupled model exhibits a distinct eastward migration of the ENSO events, whereas the anomaly coupled model is dominated by a standing mode, which is too strongly phase-locked to the annual cycle. Based on diagnostic ocean model simulations, it is shown that an erroneous eastward migration of the annual cycle of thermocline depth and upwelling is responsible for the eastward migration of the ENSO events in the coupled model. The anomaly coupled model has a comparatively weak annual cycle in the thermocline depth and upwelling. These calculations emphasize the importance of correctly simulating the mean state in order to capture realistic ENSO variability.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThe COLA Global Coupled and Anomaly Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere GCM
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume15
    journal issue17
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<2301:TCGCAA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2301
    journal lastpage2320
    treeJournal of Climate:;2002:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 017
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian