YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Compact Spatial Differencing Techniques in Numerical Modeling

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1985:;volume( 113 ):;issue: 004::page 409
    Author:
    Chang, Hai-Ru
    ,
    Shirer, Hampton N.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1985)113<0409:CSDTIN>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The accuracies of the usual centered differencing, compact differencing and finite element methods are compared linearly with a geostrophic adjustment problem and nonlinearly with a vorticity advection problem. The finite element method provides the best approximation in the geostrophic adjustment problem on either a staggered or an unstaggered grid. The compact scheme provides the most accurate representation of the wavenumber distribution for the vorticity advection when the Arakawa Jacobian J7 is used.
    • Download: (966.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Compact Spatial Differencing Techniques in Numerical Modeling

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4201293
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorChang, Hai-Ru
    contributor authorShirer, Hampton N.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:05:14Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:05:14Z
    date copyright1985/04/01
    date issued1985
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-60604.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4201293
    description abstractThe accuracies of the usual centered differencing, compact differencing and finite element methods are compared linearly with a geostrophic adjustment problem and nonlinearly with a vorticity advection problem. The finite element method provides the best approximation in the geostrophic adjustment problem on either a staggered or an unstaggered grid. The compact scheme provides the most accurate representation of the wavenumber distribution for the vorticity advection when the Arakawa Jacobian J7 is used.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleCompact Spatial Differencing Techniques in Numerical Modeling
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume113
    journal issue4
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1985)113<0409:CSDTIN>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage409
    journal lastpage423
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1985:;volume( 113 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian