Evaluation of LFM-2 Quantitative Precipitation ForecastsSource: Monthly Weather Review:;1980:;volume( 108 ):;issue: 008::page 1087Author:Bosart, Lance F.
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1087:EOLQPF>2.0.CO;2Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: The results of a near real time experiment designed to assess the state of the art of quantitative precipitation forecasting skill of the operational NMC LFM-2 are described. All available LFM-2 quantitative precipitation forecasts were verified on an area-averaged basis for southern and central New England for the period 0000 GMT 3 January through 0000 GMT 14 May 1979. Individual point verifications were also made for Albany, Boston, Concord, New York and Portland. On an area-averaged basis the LFM-2 beat (lost to) the climatological control by +18.5% (?7.4%) for the 12?24 h (24?36 h) forecast projection. On a point basis the overall LFM-2 forecasts lost to climatology by ?7.2 and ?21.9% for these forecast projections. Close examination of the results suggests that much of the loss of predictive skill in the model forecasts is the result of systematic overprediction of precipitation accompanying major cyclonic events. Possible reasons for this behavior are examined through a discussion of individual synoptic cases.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Bosart, Lance F. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T16:02:55Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T16:02:55Z | |
date copyright | 1980/08/01 | |
date issued | 1980 | |
identifier issn | 0027-0644 | |
identifier other | ams-59684.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4200269 | |
description abstract | The results of a near real time experiment designed to assess the state of the art of quantitative precipitation forecasting skill of the operational NMC LFM-2 are described. All available LFM-2 quantitative precipitation forecasts were verified on an area-averaged basis for southern and central New England for the period 0000 GMT 3 January through 0000 GMT 14 May 1979. Individual point verifications were also made for Albany, Boston, Concord, New York and Portland. On an area-averaged basis the LFM-2 beat (lost to) the climatological control by +18.5% (?7.4%) for the 12?24 h (24?36 h) forecast projection. On a point basis the overall LFM-2 forecasts lost to climatology by ?7.2 and ?21.9% for these forecast projections. Close examination of the results suggests that much of the loss of predictive skill in the model forecasts is the result of systematic overprediction of precipitation accompanying major cyclonic events. Possible reasons for this behavior are examined through a discussion of individual synoptic cases. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Evaluation of LFM-2 Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 108 | |
journal issue | 8 | |
journal title | Monthly Weather Review | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<1087:EOLQPF>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 1087 | |
journal lastpage | 1099 | |
tree | Monthly Weather Review:;1980:;volume( 108 ):;issue: 008 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |