YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Automated Guidance for Predicting Quantitative Precipitation

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1979:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 002::page 122
    Author:
    Bermowitz, Robert J.
    ,
    Zurndorfer, Edward A.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1979)107<0122:AGFPQP>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: An operational, automated guidance system for producing both probability of precipitation amount (PoPA) and categorical forecasts of precipitation amount for 233 cities in the conterminous United States is described. Regionalized equations giving the probabilities of≥0.25, ≥0.50, ≥1.0 and ≥2.0 inches for 6 and 24 h periods for both warm and cool seasons were developed with use of the Model Output Statistics technique. Categorical forecasts are produced by transforming the probability forecasts in such a way as to maximize the threat score. Two sets of guidance products were developed. The first uses predictors from the National Meteorological Center's (NMC) limited Area Fine Mesh (LFM) model, while the second uses predictors from NMC's Primitive Equation (PE) model and the Techniques Development Laboratory's Trajectory model. To test the PoPA system, operational forecasts at 215 cities were verified over a 10-month period. The PoPA categorical forecasts were compared by season to those produced subjectively at NMC and by the LFM and PE models. Threat scores and categorical biases were computed. The results indicate that, overall, the PoPA categorical forecasts were better than those of the PE and LFM models and were almost as good as those prepared subjectively at NMC.
    • Download: (579.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Automated Guidance for Predicting Quantitative Precipitation

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4199987
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBermowitz, Robert J.
    contributor authorZurndorfer, Edward A.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:02:20Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:02:20Z
    date copyright1979/02/01
    date issued1979
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-59430.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4199987
    description abstractAn operational, automated guidance system for producing both probability of precipitation amount (PoPA) and categorical forecasts of precipitation amount for 233 cities in the conterminous United States is described. Regionalized equations giving the probabilities of≥0.25, ≥0.50, ≥1.0 and ≥2.0 inches for 6 and 24 h periods for both warm and cool seasons were developed with use of the Model Output Statistics technique. Categorical forecasts are produced by transforming the probability forecasts in such a way as to maximize the threat score. Two sets of guidance products were developed. The first uses predictors from the National Meteorological Center's (NMC) limited Area Fine Mesh (LFM) model, while the second uses predictors from NMC's Primitive Equation (PE) model and the Techniques Development Laboratory's Trajectory model. To test the PoPA system, operational forecasts at 215 cities were verified over a 10-month period. The PoPA categorical forecasts were compared by season to those produced subjectively at NMC and by the LFM and PE models. Threat scores and categorical biases were computed. The results indicate that, overall, the PoPA categorical forecasts were better than those of the PE and LFM models and were almost as good as those prepared subjectively at NMC.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAutomated Guidance for Predicting Quantitative Precipitation
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume107
    journal issue2
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1979)107<0122:AGFPQP>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage122
    journal lastpage128
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1979:;volume( 107 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian