YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    On the Measurement of In-Cloud and Wet-Bulb Temperatures from an Aircraft

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1974:;volume( 102 ):;issue: 006::page 447
    Author:
    Lenschow, D. H.
    ,
    Pennell, W. T.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1974)102<0447:OTMOIC>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Measurements of air temperature with an immersion thermometer from an aircraft are invariably affected by the increased temperature of the decelerated air in the vicinity of the element. For dry air and a dry thermometer this effect is well known and usually taken into account. However, the evaporation of water from an element which has been wetted either intentionally (as in a wet-bulb thermometer) or unintentionally (by cloud or rain droplets) reduces this temperature increase. The psychrometric equation generalized for high-speed flow is used to calculate the aerodynamic correction factor for a wet temperature sensor. As an example of the magnitude of the evaporation effect, the temperature difference between a wet and a dry thermometer in a saturated airstream moving at 70 m sec?1>1C. Aircraft measurements in clouds from 3 different temperature sensors are discussed. The temperature differences between an exposed and a protected thermometer are found to be as large as 1C in conditions where the exposed thermometer is wet and the protected thermometer is dry. More importantly, the outputs of the two sensors are well correlated in clear air but are uncorrelated in cloud. Humidity measured with a wet-bulb depression sensor is found to compare very well with the output of a dewpoint hygrometer in clear air. This sensor is also a good cloud indicator since the wet-bulb depression is ?0 only when the dry-bulb thermometer is completely wet.
    • Download: (575.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      On the Measurement of In-Cloud and Wet-Bulb Temperatures from an Aircraft

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4199141
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLenschow, D. H.
    contributor authorPennell, W. T.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T16:00:34Z
    date available2017-06-09T16:00:34Z
    date copyright1974/06/01
    date issued1974
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-58669.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4199141
    description abstractMeasurements of air temperature with an immersion thermometer from an aircraft are invariably affected by the increased temperature of the decelerated air in the vicinity of the element. For dry air and a dry thermometer this effect is well known and usually taken into account. However, the evaporation of water from an element which has been wetted either intentionally (as in a wet-bulb thermometer) or unintentionally (by cloud or rain droplets) reduces this temperature increase. The psychrometric equation generalized for high-speed flow is used to calculate the aerodynamic correction factor for a wet temperature sensor. As an example of the magnitude of the evaporation effect, the temperature difference between a wet and a dry thermometer in a saturated airstream moving at 70 m sec?1>1C. Aircraft measurements in clouds from 3 different temperature sensors are discussed. The temperature differences between an exposed and a protected thermometer are found to be as large as 1C in conditions where the exposed thermometer is wet and the protected thermometer is dry. More importantly, the outputs of the two sensors are well correlated in clear air but are uncorrelated in cloud. Humidity measured with a wet-bulb depression sensor is found to compare very well with the output of a dewpoint hygrometer in clear air. This sensor is also a good cloud indicator since the wet-bulb depression is ?0 only when the dry-bulb thermometer is completely wet.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleOn the Measurement of In-Cloud and Wet-Bulb Temperatures from an Aircraft
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume102
    journal issue6
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1974)102<0447:OTMOIC>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage447
    journal lastpage454
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1974:;volume( 102 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian