YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    WIND ESTIMATION FROM GEOSTATIONARY-SATELLITE PICTURES

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1971:;volume( 099 ):;issue: 009::page 665
    Author:
    HUBERT, L. F.
    ,
    WHITNEY, L. F.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1971)099<0665:WEFGP>2.3.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The motion of properly selected clouds derived from photographs taken by the geostationary Advanced Technology Satellites provides estimates of the wind at cloud level. A large number of low- and high-cloud motions near rawin stations are compared to the balloon-derived winds to determine the levels at which these wind estimates might be used for map analyses and to assess their accuracy at those levels. For this sample, velocities of lower clouds correspond best to winds at 3,000 ft, while upper cloud velocities correspond best to winds at 30,000 ft. The median vector deviation of the cloud velocities from observed winds is 9 and 17 kt at 3,000 and 30,000 ft, respectively. Direction deviations are modest; therefore, these wind estimates are representative of the actual flow patterns in the lower and in the upper troposphere. Causes contributing to deviations are (1) uncertainty of cloud height, (2) nonadvective cloud motion, (3) photograph-measurement errors, (4) tracking errors, and (5) unrepresentative rawinsonde observations. The principal sources of cloud-velocity deviation from observed winds are ranked in order of their significance to identify the critical areas needing improvement. It appears that cloud-height uncertainty is the most significant cause of deviations, particularly about upper cloud heights. Work aimed at reducing this uncertainty is just beginning. To point out the unique problems involved, we discuss the technique of selecting and classifying cloud targets. The procedure is a subjective skill dependent upon the analyst's meteorological judgment. Despite the problems?many as yet unsolved?the single earth-synchronous satellite, with its immense areal coverage and high frequency of coverage, provides an important new source of data from remote regions.
    • Download: (1005.Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      WIND ESTIMATION FROM GEOSTATIONARY-SATELLITE PICTURES

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4198788
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorHUBERT, L. F.
    contributor authorWHITNEY, L. F.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T15:59:44Z
    date available2017-06-09T15:59:44Z
    date copyright1971/09/01
    date issued1971
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-58351.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4198788
    description abstractThe motion of properly selected clouds derived from photographs taken by the geostationary Advanced Technology Satellites provides estimates of the wind at cloud level. A large number of low- and high-cloud motions near rawin stations are compared to the balloon-derived winds to determine the levels at which these wind estimates might be used for map analyses and to assess their accuracy at those levels. For this sample, velocities of lower clouds correspond best to winds at 3,000 ft, while upper cloud velocities correspond best to winds at 30,000 ft. The median vector deviation of the cloud velocities from observed winds is 9 and 17 kt at 3,000 and 30,000 ft, respectively. Direction deviations are modest; therefore, these wind estimates are representative of the actual flow patterns in the lower and in the upper troposphere. Causes contributing to deviations are (1) uncertainty of cloud height, (2) nonadvective cloud motion, (3) photograph-measurement errors, (4) tracking errors, and (5) unrepresentative rawinsonde observations. The principal sources of cloud-velocity deviation from observed winds are ranked in order of their significance to identify the critical areas needing improvement. It appears that cloud-height uncertainty is the most significant cause of deviations, particularly about upper cloud heights. Work aimed at reducing this uncertainty is just beginning. To point out the unique problems involved, we discuss the technique of selecting and classifying cloud targets. The procedure is a subjective skill dependent upon the analyst's meteorological judgment. Despite the problems?many as yet unsolved?the single earth-synchronous satellite, with its immense areal coverage and high frequency of coverage, provides an important new source of data from remote regions.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleWIND ESTIMATION FROM GEOSTATIONARY-SATELLITE PICTURES
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume99
    journal issue9
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1971)099<0665:WEFGP>2.3.CO;2
    journal fristpage665
    journal lastpage672
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1971:;volume( 099 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian