YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Monthly Weather Review
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    HIGHER-ORDER GEOSTROPHIC WIND APPROXIMATIONS

    Source: Monthly Weather Review:;1962:;volume( 090 ):;issue: 005::page 175
    Author:
    ARNASON, G.
    ,
    HALTINER, G. J.
    ,
    FRAWLEY, M. J.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1962)090<0175:HGWA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Two iterative methods are described for obtaining horizontal winds from the pressure-height field by means of higher-order geostrophic approximations for the purpose of improving upon the geostrophic wind. The convergence properties of the iterative methods are discussed; and in a simple theoretical case, one of the methods is found to diverge with strong cyclonic motion. Both iterative methods were applied to analyzed 500-mb. height charts and over most of the map converged in a few scans to wind values somewhere between the geostrophic wind and the wind obtained from the balance equation. However in a few locations continued iteration led to increasing differences between successively computed winds: i.e., the methods appeared to diverge. In fact, wind values in adjacent areas gradually tended to be corrupted. This lack of convergence, occurring mainly in areas of negative vorticity and additionally in the case of method II in areas of strong cyclonic vorticity, was associated with the development of excessive horizontal wind divergence, which after three or four iterations sometimes exceeded the relative vorticity. Stream functions were computed by relaxing the relative vorticity of the winds obtained by methods I and II, generally after one iteration. These were compared to the stream function obtained by solving the balance equation and no significant differences were noted. Barotropic forecasts prepared from the stream functions derived from the two methods are essentially the same as forecasts with the stream function obtained from the balance equation.
    • Download: (1.031Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      HIGHER-ORDER GEOSTROPHIC WIND APPROXIMATIONS

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4197614
    Collections
    • Monthly Weather Review

    Show full item record

    contributor authorARNASON, G.
    contributor authorHALTINER, G. J.
    contributor authorFRAWLEY, M. J.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T15:57:02Z
    date available2017-06-09T15:57:02Z
    date copyright1962/05/01
    date issued1962
    identifier issn0027-0644
    identifier otherams-57294.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4197614
    description abstractTwo iterative methods are described for obtaining horizontal winds from the pressure-height field by means of higher-order geostrophic approximations for the purpose of improving upon the geostrophic wind. The convergence properties of the iterative methods are discussed; and in a simple theoretical case, one of the methods is found to diverge with strong cyclonic motion. Both iterative methods were applied to analyzed 500-mb. height charts and over most of the map converged in a few scans to wind values somewhere between the geostrophic wind and the wind obtained from the balance equation. However in a few locations continued iteration led to increasing differences between successively computed winds: i.e., the methods appeared to diverge. In fact, wind values in adjacent areas gradually tended to be corrupted. This lack of convergence, occurring mainly in areas of negative vorticity and additionally in the case of method II in areas of strong cyclonic vorticity, was associated with the development of excessive horizontal wind divergence, which after three or four iterations sometimes exceeded the relative vorticity. Stream functions were computed by relaxing the relative vorticity of the winds obtained by methods I and II, generally after one iteration. These were compared to the stream function obtained by solving the balance equation and no significant differences were noted. Barotropic forecasts prepared from the stream functions derived from the two methods are essentially the same as forecasts with the stream function obtained from the balance equation.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleHIGHER-ORDER GEOSTROPHIC WIND APPROXIMATIONS
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume90
    journal issue5
    journal titleMonthly Weather Review
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0493(1962)090<0175:HGWA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage175
    journal lastpage185
    treeMonthly Weather Review:;1962:;volume( 090 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian