YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparison of Surface Observations and ECHAM4-GCM Experiments and Its Relevance to the Indirect Aerosol Effect

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2001:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 006::page 1078
    Author:
    Liepert, Beate G.
    ,
    Lohmann, Ulrike
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1078:ACOSOA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The observations of solar irradiance at the surface, total cloud cover, and precipitation rates have been used to evaluate aerosol?cloud interactions in a GCM. Records from Germany and the United States were available for the time period from 1985 to 1990 and 1960 to 1990. The model used here is the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts?Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum: Hamburg (ECHAM4) GCM as run for a 5-yr period with a fully coupled sulfur chemistry?cloud scheme by Lohmann and Feichter. Two experiments?one with an annual mean sulfate load of 0.36 Tg S for the preindustrial simulation and one with 1.05 Tg S for the present day simulation were studied. The goal was to confirm indirectly the existence of the indirect aerosol effect by finding indices for a better agreement of observations with the present-day experiment as compared with the preindustrial experiment. The authors were able to draw such a conclusion only for the German data but not for the United States. The model correctly predicts the annual mean total cloud cover in Germany and the United States, whereas global solar radiation is underestimated by 13 W m?2. This deficiency stems from cloudy conditions. Clouds are either optically too thick or the vertical distribution of clouds is erroneous. This is confirmed by the modeled overcast solar irradiance, which is 27 W m?2 lower than observed, whereas, for the clear sky, model and observations agree. Precipitation rates are underestimated by 42% in the United States. The seasonal cycle of the precipitation rate is incorrect in all U.S. regions. The modeled cloud cover is too low over the central United States in July and August, and consequently the solar irradiance exceeds the observations during these months. The opposite occurs in winter, when the model overestimates the cloud cover and thus underestimates solar irradiance. The nonseasonality of vegetation and soil parameters is suggested as a possible cause for these deficiencies. The convective precipitation formation might also contribute to these discrepancies. On the other hand, this drying out effect of the inner continent is not as pronounced in coastal regions, and, in particular, the comparisons for the German grid box provide indications for the validity of the indirect aerosol effect. The modeled annual cloud cover and solar radiation cycles for the present-day aerosol load are in better agreement with observations. Furthermore, the model shows an interesting shift from low-cloud reduction to cirrus formation in spring as a consequence of the indirect aerosol effect, a result that is confirmed by observational data.
    • Download: (507.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Comparison of Surface Observations and ECHAM4-GCM Experiments and Its Relevance to the Indirect Aerosol Effect

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4197423
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLiepert, Beate G.
    contributor authorLohmann, Ulrike
    date accessioned2017-06-09T15:56:37Z
    date available2017-06-09T15:56:37Z
    date copyright2001/03/01
    date issued2001
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-5712.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4197423
    description abstractThe observations of solar irradiance at the surface, total cloud cover, and precipitation rates have been used to evaluate aerosol?cloud interactions in a GCM. Records from Germany and the United States were available for the time period from 1985 to 1990 and 1960 to 1990. The model used here is the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts?Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum: Hamburg (ECHAM4) GCM as run for a 5-yr period with a fully coupled sulfur chemistry?cloud scheme by Lohmann and Feichter. Two experiments?one with an annual mean sulfate load of 0.36 Tg S for the preindustrial simulation and one with 1.05 Tg S for the present day simulation were studied. The goal was to confirm indirectly the existence of the indirect aerosol effect by finding indices for a better agreement of observations with the present-day experiment as compared with the preindustrial experiment. The authors were able to draw such a conclusion only for the German data but not for the United States. The model correctly predicts the annual mean total cloud cover in Germany and the United States, whereas global solar radiation is underestimated by 13 W m?2. This deficiency stems from cloudy conditions. Clouds are either optically too thick or the vertical distribution of clouds is erroneous. This is confirmed by the modeled overcast solar irradiance, which is 27 W m?2 lower than observed, whereas, for the clear sky, model and observations agree. Precipitation rates are underestimated by 42% in the United States. The seasonal cycle of the precipitation rate is incorrect in all U.S. regions. The modeled cloud cover is too low over the central United States in July and August, and consequently the solar irradiance exceeds the observations during these months. The opposite occurs in winter, when the model overestimates the cloud cover and thus underestimates solar irradiance. The nonseasonality of vegetation and soil parameters is suggested as a possible cause for these deficiencies. The convective precipitation formation might also contribute to these discrepancies. On the other hand, this drying out effect of the inner continent is not as pronounced in coastal regions, and, in particular, the comparisons for the German grid box provide indications for the validity of the indirect aerosol effect. The modeled annual cloud cover and solar radiation cycles for the present-day aerosol load are in better agreement with observations. Furthermore, the model shows an interesting shift from low-cloud reduction to cirrus formation in spring as a consequence of the indirect aerosol effect, a result that is confirmed by observational data.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Comparison of Surface Observations and ECHAM4-GCM Experiments and Its Relevance to the Indirect Aerosol Effect
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume14
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1078:ACOSOA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1078
    journal lastpage1091
    treeJournal of Climate:;2001:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian