YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Deep-Ocean Bottom Pressure Measurement: Drift Removal and Performance

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1990:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 002::page 296
    Author:
    Watts, D. Randolph
    ,
    Kontoyiannis, Harilaos
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0296:DOBPMD>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Sixteen records from seven Digiquartz deep-ocean bottom pressure sensors have been in deployments of 3?12 month duration under the Gulf Stream in depths of 3300 to 4400 m. Particular attention is given (i) to characterizing any observed drift in their calibration in relation to their construction (bellows or Bourdon-tube) and to their prior history of pressurization, and (ii) to estimating and removing this drift from the records. Bellows-type sensors exhibited significant drift (0.2 to 0.85 db) in all of their deployments. Bourdon-tube sensors had less drift in their first deployment (0 to 0.45 db), and in subsequent deployments had either no drift or a small drift with different shape that may have been due to clock-frequency drift. An exponential decay with time [?exp(?αt)] was found to best represent the drifts, such a curve was fit in a least-squares sense to each pressure record and then subtracted from it Careful attention is given to estimating the uncertainty of the residual ?dedrifted? records, which is 0.02 dh for records that are at least a year long; the stability over a few days and resolution of these measurements is better than 0.001 db. As a consistency cheer, neighboring pairs of bottom pressure records are used to calculate geostrophic currents from their differences, and the comparison with directly observed currents confirms that the error in drift removal may be less than 0.02 db. Typical amplitudes of the deep-ocean tidal- and derided signals are respectively 0.7 and 0.13 db in this region, so that we infer that this methodology is suitable for studies requiring knowledge of deep-ocean dynamic pressures even for subtidal mesoscale periodicites.
    • Download: (824.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Deep-Ocean Bottom Pressure Measurement: Drift Removal and Performance

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4197289
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWatts, D. Randolph
    contributor authorKontoyiannis, Harilaos
    date accessioned2017-06-09T15:56:10Z
    date available2017-06-09T15:56:10Z
    date copyright1990/04/01
    date issued1990
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-570.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4197289
    description abstractSixteen records from seven Digiquartz deep-ocean bottom pressure sensors have been in deployments of 3?12 month duration under the Gulf Stream in depths of 3300 to 4400 m. Particular attention is given (i) to characterizing any observed drift in their calibration in relation to their construction (bellows or Bourdon-tube) and to their prior history of pressurization, and (ii) to estimating and removing this drift from the records. Bellows-type sensors exhibited significant drift (0.2 to 0.85 db) in all of their deployments. Bourdon-tube sensors had less drift in their first deployment (0 to 0.45 db), and in subsequent deployments had either no drift or a small drift with different shape that may have been due to clock-frequency drift. An exponential decay with time [?exp(?αt)] was found to best represent the drifts, such a curve was fit in a least-squares sense to each pressure record and then subtracted from it Careful attention is given to estimating the uncertainty of the residual ?dedrifted? records, which is 0.02 dh for records that are at least a year long; the stability over a few days and resolution of these measurements is better than 0.001 db. As a consistency cheer, neighboring pairs of bottom pressure records are used to calculate geostrophic currents from their differences, and the comparison with directly observed currents confirms that the error in drift removal may be less than 0.02 db. Typical amplitudes of the deep-ocean tidal- and derided signals are respectively 0.7 and 0.13 db in this region, so that we infer that this methodology is suitable for studies requiring knowledge of deep-ocean dynamic pressures even for subtidal mesoscale periodicites.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleDeep-Ocean Bottom Pressure Measurement: Drift Removal and Performance
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1990)007<0296:DOBPMD>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage296
    journal lastpage306
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1990:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian