YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Coarse-Grid and Cloud-Resolving Simulations of a Midlatitude Cyclonic Cloud System: Implications for the Parameterization of Layer Clouds in GCMs

    Source: Journal of Climate:;2000:;volume( 013 ):;issue: 011::page 1972
    Author:
    Szeto, K. K.
    ,
    Guan, H.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1972:CGACRS>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A winter oceanic cyclonic cloud system was simulated by using the mesoscale compressible community (MC2) model with different combinations of model resolutions and cloud microphysics packages. Results from these simulations are intercompared to examine the effects of the coarse model grid and simplified model physics on the simulated large-scale storm environment. When aggregated to an area approximately equivalent to the size of a grid box in current GCMs, the results from the models differ significantly in the large-scale cloud and moisture profiles. Although the effects of using different stratiform cloud schemes on the coarse-grid results are appreciable, the effects of different model resolution are shown to be greater on the large-scale frontal cloud field. In particular, the coarse-grid models underestimated the cloudiness and atmospheric moisture content in the warm-frontal region. Such differences in the large-scale model storm environment were consequences of the stronger mean cross-front circulation and mesoscale cloud features in the high-resolution simulation. The stronger cross-front circulation was in turn a result of stronger frontogenetic processes over the region and dynamic influences of the mesoscale cloud bands on the parent storm. Because both the frontal zones and the mesoscale cloud bands are unresolved features in current GCMs, these results suggest that the parameterization of their bulk effects on the large scales should be included in the representation of frontal layered clouds in climate models.
    • Download: (383.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Coarse-Grid and Cloud-Resolving Simulations of a Midlatitude Cyclonic Cloud System: Implications for the Parameterization of Layer Clouds in GCMs

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4194833
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSzeto, K. K.
    contributor authorGuan, H.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T15:50:21Z
    date available2017-06-09T15:50:21Z
    date copyright2000/06/01
    date issued2000
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-5479.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4194833
    description abstractA winter oceanic cyclonic cloud system was simulated by using the mesoscale compressible community (MC2) model with different combinations of model resolutions and cloud microphysics packages. Results from these simulations are intercompared to examine the effects of the coarse model grid and simplified model physics on the simulated large-scale storm environment. When aggregated to an area approximately equivalent to the size of a grid box in current GCMs, the results from the models differ significantly in the large-scale cloud and moisture profiles. Although the effects of using different stratiform cloud schemes on the coarse-grid results are appreciable, the effects of different model resolution are shown to be greater on the large-scale frontal cloud field. In particular, the coarse-grid models underestimated the cloudiness and atmospheric moisture content in the warm-frontal region. Such differences in the large-scale model storm environment were consequences of the stronger mean cross-front circulation and mesoscale cloud features in the high-resolution simulation. The stronger cross-front circulation was in turn a result of stronger frontogenetic processes over the region and dynamic influences of the mesoscale cloud bands on the parent storm. Because both the frontal zones and the mesoscale cloud bands are unresolved features in current GCMs, these results suggest that the parameterization of their bulk effects on the large scales should be included in the representation of frontal layered clouds in climate models.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleCoarse-Grid and Cloud-Resolving Simulations of a Midlatitude Cyclonic Cloud System: Implications for the Parameterization of Layer Clouds in GCMs
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume13
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<1972:CGACRS>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1972
    journal lastpage1978
    treeJournal of Climate:;2000:;volume( 013 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian