Temperature Trends of the U.S. Historical Climatology Network Based on Satellite-Designated Land Use/Land CoverSource: Journal of Climate:;1999:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 005::page 1344DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1344:TTOTUS>2.0.CO;2Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: The 1221 weather observation stations that compose the U.S. Historical Climatology Network were designated as either urban, suburban, or rural based on data from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Operational Linescan System (OLS). The designations were based on local and regional samples of the OLS data around the stations (OLS method). Trends in monthly maximum and minimum temperature and the diurnal temperature range (DTR) were determined for the 1950?96 interval for each of three land use/land cover (LULC) designations. The temperature trends for the OLS-derived designations of LULC were compared to similarly designated LULC based on (i) map- (Operational Navigation Charts) and population-based estimates of LULC (ONCP method), and (ii) LULC designations that resulted from of a survey of the network station operators. Although differences were not statistically significant, the DTR trends (degrees Celsius per 100 years) did differ between the LULC classes defined by the OLS method, from ?0.41 for the rural stations to ?0.86 for the urban stations. Trends also differed, although not significantly, between the methods used to define an LULC class, such that the trends in rural DTR varied from ?0.41 for the OLS defined stations to ?0.67 for the ONCP defined stations. Although the trends between classes were not significantly different, they do present some contrasts that might confound the interpretation of temperature trends when the local and regional environments associated with the analyzed stations are not considered. The general (urban, suburban, or rural) LULC associated with surface observation stations appears to be one of the factors that can influence the trends observed in temperatures and thus should be considered in the analysis and interpretation of temperature trends.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Gallo, Kevin P. | |
contributor author | Owen, Timothy W. | |
contributor author | Easterling, David R. | |
contributor author | Jamason, Paul F. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T15:43:57Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T15:43:57Z | |
date copyright | 1999/05/01 | |
date issued | 1999 | |
identifier issn | 0894-8755 | |
identifier other | ams-5199.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4191722 | |
description abstract | The 1221 weather observation stations that compose the U.S. Historical Climatology Network were designated as either urban, suburban, or rural based on data from the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Operational Linescan System (OLS). The designations were based on local and regional samples of the OLS data around the stations (OLS method). Trends in monthly maximum and minimum temperature and the diurnal temperature range (DTR) were determined for the 1950?96 interval for each of three land use/land cover (LULC) designations. The temperature trends for the OLS-derived designations of LULC were compared to similarly designated LULC based on (i) map- (Operational Navigation Charts) and population-based estimates of LULC (ONCP method), and (ii) LULC designations that resulted from of a survey of the network station operators. Although differences were not statistically significant, the DTR trends (degrees Celsius per 100 years) did differ between the LULC classes defined by the OLS method, from ?0.41 for the rural stations to ?0.86 for the urban stations. Trends also differed, although not significantly, between the methods used to define an LULC class, such that the trends in rural DTR varied from ?0.41 for the OLS defined stations to ?0.67 for the ONCP defined stations. Although the trends between classes were not significantly different, they do present some contrasts that might confound the interpretation of temperature trends when the local and regional environments associated with the analyzed stations are not considered. The general (urban, suburban, or rural) LULC associated with surface observation stations appears to be one of the factors that can influence the trends observed in temperatures and thus should be considered in the analysis and interpretation of temperature trends. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Temperature Trends of the U.S. Historical Climatology Network Based on Satellite-Designated Land Use/Land Cover | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 12 | |
journal issue | 5 | |
journal title | Journal of Climate | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<1344:TTOTUS>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 1344 | |
journal lastpage | 1348 | |
tree | Journal of Climate:;1999:;volume( 012 ):;issue: 005 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |