YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Do General Circulation Models Underestimate the Natural Variability in the Arctic Climate?

    Source: Journal of Climate:;1997:;volume( 010 ):;issue: 008::page 1909
    Author:
    Battisti, D. S.
    ,
    Bitz, C. M.
    ,
    Moritz, R. E.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<1909:DGCMUT>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The authors examine the natural variability of the arctic climate system simulated by two very different models: the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) global climate model, and an area-averaged model of the arctic atmosphere?sea ice?upper-ocean system called the polar cap climate model, the PCCM. A 1000-yr integration of the PCCM is performed in which the model is driven by a prescribed, stochastic atmospheric energy flux convergence (D), which has spectral characteristics that are identical to the spectra of the observed D. The standard deviation of the yearly mean sea ice thickness from this model is 0.85 m; the mean sea ice thickness is 3.1 m. In contrast, the standard deviation of the yearly averaged sea ice thickness in the GFDL climate model is found to be about 6% of the climatological mean thickness and only 24% of that simulated by the PCCM. A series of experiments is presented to determine the cause of these disparate results. First, after changing the treatment of sea ice and snow albedo in the (standard) PCCM model to be identical thermodynamically to that in the GFDL model, the PCCM is driven with D from the GFDL control integration to demonstrate that the PCCM model produces an arctic climate similar to that of the GFDL model. Integrations of the PCCM are then examined in which the different prescriptions of the sea ice treatment (GFDL vs standard PCCM) and D (GFDL vs observed) are permutated. The results indicate that unarguable improvements in the treatment of sea ice in the GFDL climate model should amplify significantly the natural variability in this model. The authors present calculations that indicate the variability in the sea ice thickness is extremely sensitive to the spectrum of the atmospheric energy flux convergence. Specifically, the differences between the GFDL and observed D at timescales shorter than 3 yr are shown to have a significant impact on the sea ice variability on all timescales. A conservative best estimate for the amplitude of the natural variability in the arctic sea ice volume is presented; this estimate is a significant fraction (about 25%) of the mean sea ice thickness. The results suggest that most of the global climate models that have been used to evaluate climate change may also have artificially quiescent natural variability in the Arctic.
    • Download: (246.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Do General Circulation Models Underestimate the Natural Variability in the Arctic Climate?

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4187567
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBattisti, D. S.
    contributor authorBitz, C. M.
    contributor authorMoritz, R. E.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T15:36:01Z
    date available2017-06-09T15:36:01Z
    date copyright1997/08/01
    date issued1997
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-4825.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4187567
    description abstractThe authors examine the natural variability of the arctic climate system simulated by two very different models: the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) global climate model, and an area-averaged model of the arctic atmosphere?sea ice?upper-ocean system called the polar cap climate model, the PCCM. A 1000-yr integration of the PCCM is performed in which the model is driven by a prescribed, stochastic atmospheric energy flux convergence (D), which has spectral characteristics that are identical to the spectra of the observed D. The standard deviation of the yearly mean sea ice thickness from this model is 0.85 m; the mean sea ice thickness is 3.1 m. In contrast, the standard deviation of the yearly averaged sea ice thickness in the GFDL climate model is found to be about 6% of the climatological mean thickness and only 24% of that simulated by the PCCM. A series of experiments is presented to determine the cause of these disparate results. First, after changing the treatment of sea ice and snow albedo in the (standard) PCCM model to be identical thermodynamically to that in the GFDL model, the PCCM is driven with D from the GFDL control integration to demonstrate that the PCCM model produces an arctic climate similar to that of the GFDL model. Integrations of the PCCM are then examined in which the different prescriptions of the sea ice treatment (GFDL vs standard PCCM) and D (GFDL vs observed) are permutated. The results indicate that unarguable improvements in the treatment of sea ice in the GFDL climate model should amplify significantly the natural variability in this model. The authors present calculations that indicate the variability in the sea ice thickness is extremely sensitive to the spectrum of the atmospheric energy flux convergence. Specifically, the differences between the GFDL and observed D at timescales shorter than 3 yr are shown to have a significant impact on the sea ice variability on all timescales. A conservative best estimate for the amplitude of the natural variability in the arctic sea ice volume is presented; this estimate is a significant fraction (about 25%) of the mean sea ice thickness. The results suggest that most of the global climate models that have been used to evaluate climate change may also have artificially quiescent natural variability in the Arctic.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleDo General Circulation Models Underestimate the Natural Variability in the Arctic Climate?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume10
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<1909:DGCMUT>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1909
    journal lastpage1920
    treeJournal of Climate:;1997:;volume( 010 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian