Validation and Use of a Semidistributed Hydrological Modeling System to Predict Short-Term Effects of Clear-Cutting on a Watershed Hydrological RegimeSource: Earth Interactions:;2004:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 003::page 1Author:Lavigne, Martin-Pierre
,
Rousseau, Alain N.
,
Turcotte, Richard
,
Laroche, Anne-Marie
,
Fortin, Jean-Pierre
,
Villeneuve, Jean-Pierre
DOI: 10.1175/1087-3562(2004)008<0001:VAUOAS>2.0.CO;2Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: The Gestion Intégrée des Bassins versants à l'aide d'un Système Informatisé (GIBSI), a semidistributed hydrological modeling system, was evaluated for its ability to simulate the impact of deforestation on the hydrological regime of the Famine River watershed (728 km2), a subwatershed of the Chaudière River, Québec, Canada. Annual, spring and summer, and low-water runoff, as well as peak flows, were estimated for both a base-case scenario and a deforestation scenario using 31 annual meteorological series. GIBSI simulated an average increase of annual runoff after clear-cutting of 57% (268 mm) and the proportion of runoff to precipitation increased from 40% to 63%. The average increase in spring runoff was 25%, while in summer it was 138%. For summer low-flow periods, GIBSI simulated an average increase in runoff of 102%. For spring and summer peak-flow rates, hydrographs generated by GIBSI showed that average spring peak flows were increased after deforestation by 26% while summer peak flows were increased by 101%. Differences between spring and summer runoffs as well as peak-flow rates are due to changes in the degree of saturation of the soil and actual evapotranspiration between the two scenarios. Hence, while land-use changes have a substantial impact on summer runoff and low flows, they have little impact on extreme peak-flow events, especially during spring (less than 10% or more than 90% nonexceeding probability). This suggests that land use has a limited role in controlling these extreme events. The simulation results obtained by GIBSI were consistent with those found in the literature. Therefore, GIBSI offers potential as a management tool for investigating prevention and reduction measures of deforestation effects on the hydrological regime of a watershed.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Lavigne, Martin-Pierre | |
contributor author | Rousseau, Alain N. | |
contributor author | Turcotte, Richard | |
contributor author | Laroche, Anne-Marie | |
contributor author | Fortin, Jean-Pierre | |
contributor author | Villeneuve, Jean-Pierre | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T15:24:43Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T15:24:43Z | |
date copyright | 2004/03/01 | |
date issued | 2004 | |
identifier other | ams-43.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4181733 | |
description abstract | The Gestion Intégrée des Bassins versants à l'aide d'un Système Informatisé (GIBSI), a semidistributed hydrological modeling system, was evaluated for its ability to simulate the impact of deforestation on the hydrological regime of the Famine River watershed (728 km2), a subwatershed of the Chaudière River, Québec, Canada. Annual, spring and summer, and low-water runoff, as well as peak flows, were estimated for both a base-case scenario and a deforestation scenario using 31 annual meteorological series. GIBSI simulated an average increase of annual runoff after clear-cutting of 57% (268 mm) and the proportion of runoff to precipitation increased from 40% to 63%. The average increase in spring runoff was 25%, while in summer it was 138%. For summer low-flow periods, GIBSI simulated an average increase in runoff of 102%. For spring and summer peak-flow rates, hydrographs generated by GIBSI showed that average spring peak flows were increased after deforestation by 26% while summer peak flows were increased by 101%. Differences between spring and summer runoffs as well as peak-flow rates are due to changes in the degree of saturation of the soil and actual evapotranspiration between the two scenarios. Hence, while land-use changes have a substantial impact on summer runoff and low flows, they have little impact on extreme peak-flow events, especially during spring (less than 10% or more than 90% nonexceeding probability). This suggests that land use has a limited role in controlling these extreme events. The simulation results obtained by GIBSI were consistent with those found in the literature. Therefore, GIBSI offers potential as a management tool for investigating prevention and reduction measures of deforestation effects on the hydrological regime of a watershed. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Validation and Use of a Semidistributed Hydrological Modeling System to Predict Short-Term Effects of Clear-Cutting on a Watershed Hydrological Regime | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 8 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Earth Interactions | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1087-3562(2004)008<0001:VAUOAS>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 1 | |
journal lastpage | 19 | |
tree | Earth Interactions:;2004:;volume( 008 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |