YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Climate
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Validation of ISCCP Cloud Detections

    Source: Journal of Climate:;1993:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 012::page 2370
    Author:
    Rossow, William B.
    ,
    Garder, Leonid C.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<2370:VOICD>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) began in 1983 to collect and analyze weather satellite datasets to produce a new global cloud climatology as part of the World Climate Research Programme. The first step of the analysis is detection of the presence of clouds at each location and time by a series of tests on the space / time variations of infrared and visible radiances. This paper describes the validation of the ISCCP cloud detections by verifying the accuracy of the inferred clear-sky radiance. Comparison of retrieved surface temperatures to other measurements shows that bias errors are <2 K and random errors are about 2 K for sea surface (monthly means at 280-km scales) and that bias errors are <2 K and random errors are about 4 K for land surfaces (3 hourly at 280-km scale). Bias errors over a few persistently cloudy locations are sometimes ?(2?4) K and over winter sea ice may be about +2 K. Surface reflectances are confirmed to be within 3% of other measurements and models for ocean, except for sun glint geometries, and to be within 3%?5% for land surfaces. Sufficiently accurate validation data are not available for visible reflectances of sea ice and snow-covered land, but some tests of specific cases suggest that errors are ?10%. These errors in clear-sky radiances suggest uncertainties in the ISCCP cloud detections of about 10% with a small (3%?6%) negative bias over land. Some specific regions exhibit both larger rms uncertainties and somewhat larger biases in cloud amount approaching 10%. ISCCP cloud detections are more in error over the polar regions than anywhere else. Based on comparisons with an analysis of radiances measured at other wavelengths, the ISCCP analysis appears to miss 15%?25% of the clouds in summer but only 5%?10% of the winter clouds.
    • Download: (1.909Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Validation of ISCCP Cloud Detections

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4179779
    Collections
    • Journal of Climate

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRossow, William B.
    contributor authorGarder, Leonid C.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T15:21:00Z
    date available2017-06-09T15:21:00Z
    date copyright1993/12/01
    date issued1993
    identifier issn0894-8755
    identifier otherams-4124.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4179779
    description abstractThe International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) began in 1983 to collect and analyze weather satellite datasets to produce a new global cloud climatology as part of the World Climate Research Programme. The first step of the analysis is detection of the presence of clouds at each location and time by a series of tests on the space / time variations of infrared and visible radiances. This paper describes the validation of the ISCCP cloud detections by verifying the accuracy of the inferred clear-sky radiance. Comparison of retrieved surface temperatures to other measurements shows that bias errors are <2 K and random errors are about 2 K for sea surface (monthly means at 280-km scales) and that bias errors are <2 K and random errors are about 4 K for land surfaces (3 hourly at 280-km scale). Bias errors over a few persistently cloudy locations are sometimes ?(2?4) K and over winter sea ice may be about +2 K. Surface reflectances are confirmed to be within 3% of other measurements and models for ocean, except for sun glint geometries, and to be within 3%?5% for land surfaces. Sufficiently accurate validation data are not available for visible reflectances of sea ice and snow-covered land, but some tests of specific cases suggest that errors are ?10%. These errors in clear-sky radiances suggest uncertainties in the ISCCP cloud detections of about 10% with a small (3%?6%) negative bias over land. Some specific regions exhibit both larger rms uncertainties and somewhat larger biases in cloud amount approaching 10%. ISCCP cloud detections are more in error over the polar regions than anywhere else. Based on comparisons with an analysis of radiances measured at other wavelengths, the ISCCP analysis appears to miss 15%?25% of the clouds in summer but only 5%?10% of the winter clouds.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleValidation of ISCCP Cloud Detections
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume6
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Climate
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006<2370:VOICD>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2370
    journal lastpage2393
    treeJournal of Climate:;1993:;volume( 006 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian