Mobile Mesonet Observations on 3 May 1999Source: Weather and Forecasting:;2002:;volume( 017 ):;issue: 003::page 430Author:Markowski, Paul M.
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0430:MMOOM>2.0.CO;2Publisher: American Meteorological Society
Abstract: Two long-lived tornadic supercells were sampled by an automobile-borne observing system on 3 May 1999. The ?mobile mesonet? observed relatively warm and moist air, weak baroclinity, and small pressure excess at the surface within the rear-flank downdrafts of the storms. Furthermore, the downdraft air parcels, which have been shown to enter the tornado in past observational and modeling studies, were associated with substantial convective available potential energy and small convective inhibition. The detection of only small equivalent potential temperature deficits (1?4 K) within the downdrafts may imply that the downdrafts were driven primarily by nonhydrostatic pressure gradients and/or precipitation drag, rather than by the entrainment of potentially cold environmental air at midlevels.
|
Collections
Show full item record
contributor author | Markowski, Paul M. | |
date accessioned | 2017-06-09T15:01:26Z | |
date available | 2017-06-09T15:01:26Z | |
date copyright | 2002/06/01 | |
date issued | 2002 | |
identifier issn | 0882-8156 | |
identifier other | ams-3239.pdf | |
identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4169945 | |
description abstract | Two long-lived tornadic supercells were sampled by an automobile-borne observing system on 3 May 1999. The ?mobile mesonet? observed relatively warm and moist air, weak baroclinity, and small pressure excess at the surface within the rear-flank downdrafts of the storms. Furthermore, the downdraft air parcels, which have been shown to enter the tornado in past observational and modeling studies, were associated with substantial convective available potential energy and small convective inhibition. The detection of only small equivalent potential temperature deficits (1?4 K) within the downdrafts may imply that the downdrafts were driven primarily by nonhydrostatic pressure gradients and/or precipitation drag, rather than by the entrainment of potentially cold environmental air at midlevels. | |
publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
title | Mobile Mesonet Observations on 3 May 1999 | |
type | Journal Paper | |
journal volume | 17 | |
journal issue | 3 | |
journal title | Weather and Forecasting | |
identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0434(2002)017<0430:MMOOM>2.0.CO;2 | |
journal fristpage | 430 | |
journal lastpage | 444 | |
tree | Weather and Forecasting:;2002:;volume( 017 ):;issue: 003 | |
contenttype | Fulltext |