YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    An Optimal Model Output Calibration Algorithm Suitable for Objective Temperature Forecasting

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;1999:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 002::page 190
    Author:
    Mao, Qi
    ,
    McNider, Richard T.
    ,
    Mueller, Stephen F.
    ,
    Juang, Hann-Ming Henry
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<0190:AOMOCA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: An optimal model output calibration (MOC) algorithm suitable for surface air temperature forecasts is proposed and tested with the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Regional Spectral Model (RSM). Differing from existing methodologies and the traditional model output statistics (MOS) technique, the MOC algorithm uses forecasts and observations of the most recent 2?4 weeks to objectively estimate and adjust the current model forecast errors and make refined predictions. The MOC equation, a multivariate linear regression equation with forecast error being the predictand, objectively screens as many as 30 candidates of predictors and optimally selects no more than 6. The equation varies from day to day and from site to site. Since it does not rely on long-term statistics of stable model runs, the MOC minimizes the influence of changes in model physics and spatial resolution on the forecast refinement process. Forecast experiments were conducted for six major urban centers in the Tennessee Valley over the period of 27 June to 30 July 1997. Surface air temperature forecasts out to 72 h were produced based upon RSM runs initialized from 0000 UTC observations. Performance of the MOC for minimum and maximum temperature forecasts was assessed by determining mean forecast error (BIAS), mean absolute error (MAE), and root-mean-square errors (rmse) for both the MOC-adjusted and nonadjusted RSM output. The same statistical measures for Nested Grid Model?MOS forecasts over the experiment period were also provided for instruction. A skill score was calculated to demonstrate the improvement of refined forecasts with the MOC over the RSM. On average for the six sites, reduction of forecast errors by the MOC ranged from 58% to 98% in BIAS, 40% to 52% in MAE, and 33% to 46% in rmse. It also showed that the error frequencies of the refined forecasts had Gaussian distributions with the peak centered around zero. The error bands were narrower using the MOC and there were decreases in large forecast errors, especially during the first 48 h. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to verify that populations of the forecast errors before and after the MOC adjustment were statistically far enough apart to be distinct at a high significance level. Forecast experiments were also conducted to address the issue of sensitivity of the MOC by varying the length of the time series used in deriving the MOC equation. It was found that the mean biases of the refined forecasts slightly increased and the MAE and rmse slightly decreased with increasing length of the time series from 2 to 4 weeks. The study demonstrated the usefulness of the MOC for objective temperature forecasting, especially in an operational environment in which changes in model physics and configurations are continually implemented and no long-term stable model runs are readily available to generate MOS forecast guidance. The MOC is also informative for diagnosing and tuning model physics. The study suggests that the MOC may be applied to other weather forecast elements, such as precipitation, cloud cover, visibility, and wind speed and direction.
    • Download: (223.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      An Optimal Model Output Calibration Algorithm Suitable for Objective Temperature Forecasting

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4167679
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMao, Qi
    contributor authorMcNider, Richard T.
    contributor authorMueller, Stephen F.
    contributor authorJuang, Hann-Ming Henry
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:57:05Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:57:05Z
    date copyright1999/04/01
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-3035.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4167679
    description abstractAn optimal model output calibration (MOC) algorithm suitable for surface air temperature forecasts is proposed and tested with the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Regional Spectral Model (RSM). Differing from existing methodologies and the traditional model output statistics (MOS) technique, the MOC algorithm uses forecasts and observations of the most recent 2?4 weeks to objectively estimate and adjust the current model forecast errors and make refined predictions. The MOC equation, a multivariate linear regression equation with forecast error being the predictand, objectively screens as many as 30 candidates of predictors and optimally selects no more than 6. The equation varies from day to day and from site to site. Since it does not rely on long-term statistics of stable model runs, the MOC minimizes the influence of changes in model physics and spatial resolution on the forecast refinement process. Forecast experiments were conducted for six major urban centers in the Tennessee Valley over the period of 27 June to 30 July 1997. Surface air temperature forecasts out to 72 h were produced based upon RSM runs initialized from 0000 UTC observations. Performance of the MOC for minimum and maximum temperature forecasts was assessed by determining mean forecast error (BIAS), mean absolute error (MAE), and root-mean-square errors (rmse) for both the MOC-adjusted and nonadjusted RSM output. The same statistical measures for Nested Grid Model?MOS forecasts over the experiment period were also provided for instruction. A skill score was calculated to demonstrate the improvement of refined forecasts with the MOC over the RSM. On average for the six sites, reduction of forecast errors by the MOC ranged from 58% to 98% in BIAS, 40% to 52% in MAE, and 33% to 46% in rmse. It also showed that the error frequencies of the refined forecasts had Gaussian distributions with the peak centered around zero. The error bands were narrower using the MOC and there were decreases in large forecast errors, especially during the first 48 h. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to verify that populations of the forecast errors before and after the MOC adjustment were statistically far enough apart to be distinct at a high significance level. Forecast experiments were also conducted to address the issue of sensitivity of the MOC by varying the length of the time series used in deriving the MOC equation. It was found that the mean biases of the refined forecasts slightly increased and the MAE and rmse slightly decreased with increasing length of the time series from 2 to 4 weeks. The study demonstrated the usefulness of the MOC for objective temperature forecasting, especially in an operational environment in which changes in model physics and configurations are continually implemented and no long-term stable model runs are readily available to generate MOS forecast guidance. The MOC is also informative for diagnosing and tuning model physics. The study suggests that the MOC may be applied to other weather forecast elements, such as precipitation, cloud cover, visibility, and wind speed and direction.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAn Optimal Model Output Calibration Algorithm Suitable for Objective Temperature Forecasting
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume14
    journal issue2
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<0190:AOMOCA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage190
    journal lastpage202
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;1999:;volume( 014 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian