YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    How Topographic Smoothing Contributes to Differences between the Eddy Flows Simulated by Sigma- and Geopotential-Coordinate Models

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;2002:;Volume( 032 ):;issue: 001::page 122
    Author:
    Penduff, Thierry
    ,
    Barnier, Bernard
    ,
    Kerbiriou, Marie-Aurélie
    ,
    Verron, Jacques
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<0122:HTSCTD>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The characteristics of the mesoscale turbulence simulated at a resolution of ?° by a sigma-coordinate model (SPEM) and a geopotential-coordinate model (OPA) of the South Atlantic differ significantly. These two types of models differ with respect to not only their numerical formulation, but also their topography (smoothed in SPEM, as in every sigma-coordinate application). In this paper, the authors examine how these topographic differences result in eddy flows that are different in the two models. When the topography of the Agulhas region is smoothed locally in OPA, as is done routinely in SPEM, the production mechanism of the Agulhas rings, their characteristics, and their subsequent drift in the subtropical gyre, are found to converge toward those in SPEM. Furthermore, the vertical distribution of eddy kinetic energy (EKE) everywhere in the basin interior becomes similar in SPEM and OPA and, according to some current meter data, becomes more realistic when mesoscale topographic roughness is removed from the OPA bathymetry (as in SPEM). As expected from previous process studies, this treatment also makes the sensitivity of the Agulhas rings to the Walvis Ridge become similar in SPEM and OPA. These findings demonstrate that many properties of the eddies produced by sigma- and geopotential-coordinate models are, to a significant extent, due to the use of different topographies, and are not intrinsic to the use of different vertical coordinates. Other dynamical differences, such as the separation of western boundary currents from the shelf or the interaction of the flow with the Zapiola Ridge, are attributed to intrinsic differences between both models. More generally, it is believed that, in the absence of a correct parameterization of current?topography interactions, a certain amount of topographic smoothing may have a beneficial impact on geopotential coordinate model solutions.
    • Download: (1.493Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      How Topographic Smoothing Contributes to Differences between the Eddy Flows Simulated by Sigma- and Geopotential-Coordinate Models

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4166850
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorPenduff, Thierry
    contributor authorBarnier, Bernard
    contributor authorKerbiriou, Marie-Aurélie
    contributor authorVerron, Jacques
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:55:00Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:55:00Z
    date copyright2002/01/01
    date issued2002
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-29604.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4166850
    description abstractThe characteristics of the mesoscale turbulence simulated at a resolution of ?° by a sigma-coordinate model (SPEM) and a geopotential-coordinate model (OPA) of the South Atlantic differ significantly. These two types of models differ with respect to not only their numerical formulation, but also their topography (smoothed in SPEM, as in every sigma-coordinate application). In this paper, the authors examine how these topographic differences result in eddy flows that are different in the two models. When the topography of the Agulhas region is smoothed locally in OPA, as is done routinely in SPEM, the production mechanism of the Agulhas rings, their characteristics, and their subsequent drift in the subtropical gyre, are found to converge toward those in SPEM. Furthermore, the vertical distribution of eddy kinetic energy (EKE) everywhere in the basin interior becomes similar in SPEM and OPA and, according to some current meter data, becomes more realistic when mesoscale topographic roughness is removed from the OPA bathymetry (as in SPEM). As expected from previous process studies, this treatment also makes the sensitivity of the Agulhas rings to the Walvis Ridge become similar in SPEM and OPA. These findings demonstrate that many properties of the eddies produced by sigma- and geopotential-coordinate models are, to a significant extent, due to the use of different topographies, and are not intrinsic to the use of different vertical coordinates. Other dynamical differences, such as the separation of western boundary currents from the shelf or the interaction of the flow with the Zapiola Ridge, are attributed to intrinsic differences between both models. More generally, it is believed that, in the absence of a correct parameterization of current?topography interactions, a certain amount of topographic smoothing may have a beneficial impact on geopotential coordinate model solutions.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleHow Topographic Smoothing Contributes to Differences between the Eddy Flows Simulated by Sigma- and Geopotential-Coordinate Models
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume32
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032<0122:HTSCTD>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage122
    journal lastpage137
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;2002:;Volume( 032 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian