YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Diapycnal Mixing in the Ocean: The Osborn–Cox Model

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;1994:;Volume( 024 ):;issue: 012::page 2560
    Author:
    Davis, Russ E.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024<2560:DMITOT>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The Osborn-Cox model is a simplified tracer variance budget that is a basis for direct estimates of the diapycnal Kv. diffusivity When used to interpret temperature variance dissipation measurements, it indicates Kv to be O(10?5 m2 s?1) in the thermocline?much smaller than the diffusivities found by matching large-scale observations to models or budgets. It is argued that, if the Osborn-Cox model is to describe fluxes in the general circulation, it must describe the variance budget of all fluctuations around the long-term average used to define the general circulation. Within this framework, the simplifications leading to the Osborn-Cox model are re-examined to find if they still hold and which is most likely to cause Kv errors. Factors examined (and the importance found) are approximations in the Fourier and Ficks diffusion laws (unimportant), accumulation and advection of tracer variance (unimportant except in regions of strong upwelling), variance production by lateral fluxes (dominant at higher latitudes), sampling errors in estimating the mean tracer gradient (unimportant), and turbulent fluxes of variance ?u???2?. Variance production by lateral fluxes is most common where stratification is weak and causes the Osborn?Cox model to overestimate Kv. The triple product, or turbulent flux of variance, represents potential exchanges of variance between the small turbulent scales and larger variability scales. It cannot be dismissed by scale analysis, and relying on the analogy or a hypothesis of scale isolation to neglect this effect makes the Osborn-Cox model a theory to be verified rather than a deduction.
    • Download: (1.482Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Diapycnal Mixing in the Ocean: The Osborn–Cox Model

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4165322
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDavis, Russ E.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:51:14Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:51:14Z
    date copyright1994/12/01
    date issued1994
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-28229.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4165322
    description abstractThe Osborn-Cox model is a simplified tracer variance budget that is a basis for direct estimates of the diapycnal Kv. diffusivity When used to interpret temperature variance dissipation measurements, it indicates Kv to be O(10?5 m2 s?1) in the thermocline?much smaller than the diffusivities found by matching large-scale observations to models or budgets. It is argued that, if the Osborn-Cox model is to describe fluxes in the general circulation, it must describe the variance budget of all fluctuations around the long-term average used to define the general circulation. Within this framework, the simplifications leading to the Osborn-Cox model are re-examined to find if they still hold and which is most likely to cause Kv errors. Factors examined (and the importance found) are approximations in the Fourier and Ficks diffusion laws (unimportant), accumulation and advection of tracer variance (unimportant except in regions of strong upwelling), variance production by lateral fluxes (dominant at higher latitudes), sampling errors in estimating the mean tracer gradient (unimportant), and turbulent fluxes of variance ?u???2?. Variance production by lateral fluxes is most common where stratification is weak and causes the Osborn?Cox model to overestimate Kv. The triple product, or turbulent flux of variance, represents potential exchanges of variance between the small turbulent scales and larger variability scales. It cannot be dismissed by scale analysis, and relying on the analogy or a hypothesis of scale isolation to neglect this effect makes the Osborn-Cox model a theory to be verified rather than a deduction.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleDiapycnal Mixing in the Ocean: The Osborn–Cox Model
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume24
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024<2560:DMITOT>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2560
    journal lastpage2576
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;1994:;Volume( 024 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian