YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Australia-Bermuda Sound Transmission Experiment (1960) Revisited

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;1988:;Volume( 018 ):;issue: 012::page 1876
    Author:
    Munk, W. H.
    ,
    O'Reilly, W. C.
    ,
    Reid, J. L.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1988)018<1876:ABSTER>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Detonations at the depth of the sound channel axis off Perth, Australia were recorded on Bermuda hydrophones at a 178°.2 range (180° is antipodal). The analysis by Shockley et al. of this 1960 transmission experiment allows for the geographic variation in the sound speed profile along the great circle path. The agreement between measured and computed travel times is within 10 s. We have modified the Shockley et al. analysis by allowing for Earth flattening and lateral refraction. The appropriate path on an ellipsoidal Earth is the geodesic, and this differs significantly from the put circle for nearly antipodal ranges. The southernmost point of the geodesic is at 52°1 S as compared to 47°.3 S for the great circle, and the geodesic travel time lags the great circle travel time by an unacceptable 34 s on account of the cold, slow waters at high southern latitudes. The effect of lateral refraction is in the opposite sense: the appropriate refracted ray path is northward of the great circle; in fact it intersects the African continent so that there is no direct Perth to Bermuda path: Bermuda is in the shadow. We find that a scattered path just rounding the tip of South Africa, thus consisting of one refracted ray from Perth to Cape Agulhas and another ray from Cape Agulhas to Bermuda (with a 3° kink at Cape Agulhas), has a travel time within a Few seconds of the measured 13 000 s travel time. There remains the question of how enough acoustic energy gets into the shadow zone to account for the measured intensity at Bermuda (which is poorly known). Diffraction is too weak. Bottom scatter and bottom refraction off Cape Agalhas may be significant. A continuous diffusion into the acoustic shadow by internal wave inhomogeneities is a more likely candidate. We favor, as an explanation, perturbations in lateral refraction associated with the intense mesoscale activity in the area of the Agulhas retroflection. The conclusion is that global acoustic transmissions are very sensitive to oceanographic conditions.
    • Download: (1.696Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Australia-Bermuda Sound Transmission Experiment (1960) Revisited

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4164449
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMunk, W. H.
    contributor authorO'Reilly, W. C.
    contributor authorReid, J. L.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:49:04Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:49:04Z
    date copyright1988/12/01
    date issued1988
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-27443.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4164449
    description abstractDetonations at the depth of the sound channel axis off Perth, Australia were recorded on Bermuda hydrophones at a 178°.2 range (180° is antipodal). The analysis by Shockley et al. of this 1960 transmission experiment allows for the geographic variation in the sound speed profile along the great circle path. The agreement between measured and computed travel times is within 10 s. We have modified the Shockley et al. analysis by allowing for Earth flattening and lateral refraction. The appropriate path on an ellipsoidal Earth is the geodesic, and this differs significantly from the put circle for nearly antipodal ranges. The southernmost point of the geodesic is at 52°1 S as compared to 47°.3 S for the great circle, and the geodesic travel time lags the great circle travel time by an unacceptable 34 s on account of the cold, slow waters at high southern latitudes. The effect of lateral refraction is in the opposite sense: the appropriate refracted ray path is northward of the great circle; in fact it intersects the African continent so that there is no direct Perth to Bermuda path: Bermuda is in the shadow. We find that a scattered path just rounding the tip of South Africa, thus consisting of one refracted ray from Perth to Cape Agulhas and another ray from Cape Agulhas to Bermuda (with a 3° kink at Cape Agulhas), has a travel time within a Few seconds of the measured 13 000 s travel time. There remains the question of how enough acoustic energy gets into the shadow zone to account for the measured intensity at Bermuda (which is poorly known). Diffraction is too weak. Bottom scatter and bottom refraction off Cape Agalhas may be significant. A continuous diffusion into the acoustic shadow by internal wave inhomogeneities is a more likely candidate. We favor, as an explanation, perturbations in lateral refraction associated with the intense mesoscale activity in the area of the Agulhas retroflection. The conclusion is that global acoustic transmissions are very sensitive to oceanographic conditions.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAustralia-Bermuda Sound Transmission Experiment (1960) Revisited
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume18
    journal issue12
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(1988)018<1876:ABSTER>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1876
    journal lastpage1898
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;1988:;Volume( 018 ):;issue: 012
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian