YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Application of Remote Wind-Forced Coastal Trapped Wave Theory to the Oregon and Washington Coasts

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;1984:;Volume( 014 ):;issue: 005::page 887
    Author:
    Battisti, David S.
    ,
    Hickey, Barbara M.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1984)014<0887:AORWFC>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The theory of coastal trapped waves generated by remote wind forcing (Clarke) is used to calculate coastal subsurface pressure (SSP) and longshore velocity along the Oregon and Washington coasts for three two-month periods: summer of 1972, summer of 1978 and winter of 1977. The response in SSP and longshore velocity is assumed to be dominated by the mode one wave. In every case, coherence squared between observed and modeled SSP is significant at the 95% level over the entire low frequency band (≤0.2 cpd) with an average phase difference less than ±30°. Greater than 80% of the variance in coastal SSP is accounted for by the mode one coastal trapped wave (CTW). The SSP response off Washington and Oregon during summer is primarily (?35% of the variance) a result of wind forcing between San Francisco and Cape Mendocino, California. Wind stress in this region during summer is significantly larger than that off Oregon and Washington at low frequencies so that the CTW generated off California propagates northward with only minimal input from the local wind field. The local contribution to SSP off Oregon and Washington during summer is relatively small (<15%). The response during winter, on the other hand, is dominated by local wind stress, local winds being much more energetic than those to the south. Comparison between modeled and observed longshore velocity shows that at low frequencies a significant portion of the variance in longshore velocity on the Pacific Northwest shelf is also accounted for by the mode one wind forced CTW.
    • Download: (940.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Application of Remote Wind-Forced Coastal Trapped Wave Theory to the Oregon and Washington Coasts

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4163620
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBattisti, David S.
    contributor authorHickey, Barbara M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:47:05Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:47:05Z
    date copyright1984/05/01
    date issued1984
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-26698.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4163620
    description abstractThe theory of coastal trapped waves generated by remote wind forcing (Clarke) is used to calculate coastal subsurface pressure (SSP) and longshore velocity along the Oregon and Washington coasts for three two-month periods: summer of 1972, summer of 1978 and winter of 1977. The response in SSP and longshore velocity is assumed to be dominated by the mode one wave. In every case, coherence squared between observed and modeled SSP is significant at the 95% level over the entire low frequency band (≤0.2 cpd) with an average phase difference less than ±30°. Greater than 80% of the variance in coastal SSP is accounted for by the mode one coastal trapped wave (CTW). The SSP response off Washington and Oregon during summer is primarily (?35% of the variance) a result of wind forcing between San Francisco and Cape Mendocino, California. Wind stress in this region during summer is significantly larger than that off Oregon and Washington at low frequencies so that the CTW generated off California propagates northward with only minimal input from the local wind field. The local contribution to SSP off Oregon and Washington during summer is relatively small (<15%). The response during winter, on the other hand, is dominated by local wind stress, local winds being much more energetic than those to the south. Comparison between modeled and observed longshore velocity shows that at low frequencies a significant portion of the variance in longshore velocity on the Pacific Northwest shelf is also accounted for by the mode one wind forced CTW.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleApplication of Remote Wind-Forced Coastal Trapped Wave Theory to the Oregon and Washington Coasts
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume14
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(1984)014<0887:AORWFC>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage887
    journal lastpage903
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;1984:;Volume( 014 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian