YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Systematic Model Forecast Errors of Surface Cyclones in NMC's Nested-Grid Model, December 1988 through November 1990

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;1992:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 001::page 65
    Author:
    Grumm, Richard H.
    ,
    Oravec, Robert J.
    ,
    Siebers, Anthony L.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(1992)007<0065:SMFEOS>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Systematic errors in the nested-grid model (NGM) forecasts of surface cyclones are examined over a two-year period from 1 December 1988 through 30 November 1990. The parameters examined include the location, central pressure, 850-mb temperature, and the 1000-500-mb thickness over the center of the surface cyclone. The mean cyclone position error was typically 150 km at 12 h and 225 km at 24 h, and grew to about 350 km by 48 h. The overall mean cyclone pressure error was ?0.57 and ?0.68 mb at 24 and 48 h, respectively. The results show that the skill of the NGM forecasts of surface cyclones displayed both seasonal and annual variability. The seasonal variability is represented by overall smaller errors in the summer and larger errors in the winter. The NGM tended to overdeepen surface cyclones in all but the summer months. A large part of the pressure error was due to the model's inability to fill cyclones properly and a tendency to forecast systems to deepen when they were observed to fill. About 15% of the time in the winter months, the NGM forecast cyclones to deepen when they were observed to fill. The NGM had difficulty detecting the initial development of surface cyclones, especially near the elevated terrain of western North America and along the track of transient cyclones. In these same regions, the NGM tended to forecast cyclones that were not observed. There was a preponderance of both nonobserved and nonforecast cyclones over the elevated terrain of North America, indicating that the NGM has difficulty with orographic effects.
    • Download: (1.966Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Systematic Model Forecast Errors of Surface Cyclones in NMC's Nested-Grid Model, December 1988 through November 1990

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4163167
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGrumm, Richard H.
    contributor authorOravec, Robert J.
    contributor authorSiebers, Anthony L.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:46:00Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:46:00Z
    date copyright1992/03/01
    date issued1992
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-2629.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4163167
    description abstractSystematic errors in the nested-grid model (NGM) forecasts of surface cyclones are examined over a two-year period from 1 December 1988 through 30 November 1990. The parameters examined include the location, central pressure, 850-mb temperature, and the 1000-500-mb thickness over the center of the surface cyclone. The mean cyclone position error was typically 150 km at 12 h and 225 km at 24 h, and grew to about 350 km by 48 h. The overall mean cyclone pressure error was ?0.57 and ?0.68 mb at 24 and 48 h, respectively. The results show that the skill of the NGM forecasts of surface cyclones displayed both seasonal and annual variability. The seasonal variability is represented by overall smaller errors in the summer and larger errors in the winter. The NGM tended to overdeepen surface cyclones in all but the summer months. A large part of the pressure error was due to the model's inability to fill cyclones properly and a tendency to forecast systems to deepen when they were observed to fill. About 15% of the time in the winter months, the NGM forecast cyclones to deepen when they were observed to fill. The NGM had difficulty detecting the initial development of surface cyclones, especially near the elevated terrain of western North America and along the track of transient cyclones. In these same regions, the NGM tended to forecast cyclones that were not observed. There was a preponderance of both nonobserved and nonforecast cyclones over the elevated terrain of North America, indicating that the NGM has difficulty with orographic effects.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleSystematic Model Forecast Errors of Surface Cyclones in NMC's Nested-Grid Model, December 1988 through November 1990
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume7
    journal issue1
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0434(1992)007<0065:SMFEOS>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage65
    journal lastpage87
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;1992:;volume( 007 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian