YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Wind-Driven Model Experiment of the Seasonal Cycle of the Main Thermocline in the Interior Midlatitude North Pacific

    Source: Journal of Physical Oceanography:;1978:;Volume( 008 ):;issue: 005::page 818
    Author:
    White, Warren B.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1978)008<0818:AWDMEO>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A wind-driven model experiment is designed to test the effectiveness of the classical wind-driven theory of Veronis and Stommel (1956) in explaining the phase and amplitude of the seasonal cycle of the main thermocline in the interior portion of the midlatitude North Pacific. The model is a two-layer quasi-geostrophic model on the ?-plane. driven by the observed seasonal cycle of the wind-stress curl. It allows the first-mode baroclinic response to Ekman pumping by the wind stress curl, modified by baroclinic planetary (Rossby) wave effects. The horizontal phase and amplitude distributions of the seasonal cycle of temperature at 200 m over the interior midlatitude North Pacific from 25?45°N, 130°W?150°E, are determined based on XBT data collected by ship-of-opportunity from 1968?74. Quantitative comparison between these observed distributions of phase and amplitude with those of the model shows that the phase distributions have a pattern correlation of 0.72, while the amplitude distributions have a correlation of only ?0.15. Even worse is the fact that the rms magnitude for the model is 5?10 times smaller than that observed. There is some evidence that a portion of this amplitude mismatch may be due to an underestimation of the magnitude of the wind-stress curl by a factor of 2, but this does not even begin to explain the order of magnitude difference. Therefore, it must be concluded that the simple dynamical concepts put forth by Veronis and Stommel (1956) cannot account for the seasonal cycle of the main thermocline in the midlatitude North Pacific.
    • Download: (702.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Wind-Driven Model Experiment of the Seasonal Cycle of the Main Thermocline in the Interior Midlatitude North Pacific

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4162672
    Collections
    • Journal of Physical Oceanography

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWhite, Warren B.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:44:51Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:44:51Z
    date copyright1978/09/01
    date issued1978
    identifier issn0022-3670
    identifier otherams-25844.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4162672
    description abstractA wind-driven model experiment is designed to test the effectiveness of the classical wind-driven theory of Veronis and Stommel (1956) in explaining the phase and amplitude of the seasonal cycle of the main thermocline in the interior portion of the midlatitude North Pacific. The model is a two-layer quasi-geostrophic model on the ?-plane. driven by the observed seasonal cycle of the wind-stress curl. It allows the first-mode baroclinic response to Ekman pumping by the wind stress curl, modified by baroclinic planetary (Rossby) wave effects. The horizontal phase and amplitude distributions of the seasonal cycle of temperature at 200 m over the interior midlatitude North Pacific from 25?45°N, 130°W?150°E, are determined based on XBT data collected by ship-of-opportunity from 1968?74. Quantitative comparison between these observed distributions of phase and amplitude with those of the model shows that the phase distributions have a pattern correlation of 0.72, while the amplitude distributions have a correlation of only ?0.15. Even worse is the fact that the rms magnitude for the model is 5?10 times smaller than that observed. There is some evidence that a portion of this amplitude mismatch may be due to an underestimation of the magnitude of the wind-stress curl by a factor of 2, but this does not even begin to explain the order of magnitude difference. Therefore, it must be concluded that the simple dynamical concepts put forth by Veronis and Stommel (1956) cannot account for the seasonal cycle of the main thermocline in the midlatitude North Pacific.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Wind-Driven Model Experiment of the Seasonal Cycle of the Main Thermocline in the Interior Midlatitude North Pacific
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume8
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Physical Oceanography
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0485(1978)008<0818:AWDMEO>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage818
    journal lastpage824
    treeJournal of Physical Oceanography:;1978:;Volume( 008 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian