YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    New NGM-Based MOS Guidance for Maximum/Minimum Temperature, Probability of Precipitation, Cloud Amount, and Surface Wind

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;1990:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 001::page 128
    Author:
    Jacks, Eli
    ,
    Bower, J. Brent
    ,
    Dagostaro, Valery J.
    ,
    Dallavalle, J. Paul
    ,
    Erickson, Mary C.
    ,
    Su, James C.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(1990)005<0128:NNBMGF>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: In this paper, we describe the development and use of new nested grid model (NGM)-based model output statistics (MOS) guidance that has been available since 26 July 1989 for 204 stations in the contiguous United States. The new guidance, which replaced the NGM-based perfect prog package that had been operational since May 1987, consists of forecasts of max/min temperature, probability of precipitation, cloud amount, and surface wind. Guidance for all four elements is available for projections of 1 and 2 days from 0000 and 1200 UTC. The limited-area fine-mesh model (LFM)-based MOS guidance package is still available and was not affected by this change. Verification on independent data shows that NGM-based MOS and LFM-based MOS temperature forecasts are about equally accurate and that both sets of MOS guidance are clearly superior to the NGM-based perfect prog guidance. For the probability of precipitation, the NGM-based MOS guidance is consistently more skillful than the perfect prog guidance, and usually more skillful than the LFM-based MOS guidance. For cloud amount, the NGM-based MOS forecasts are more skillful than either the LFM-based MOS or the NGM-based perfect prog. Finally, the NGM-based MOS and perfect prog wind forecasts are about equally skillful, and both sets are superior to the LFM-based MOS guidance.
    • Download: (859.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      New NGM-Based MOS Guidance for Maximum/Minimum Temperature, Probability of Precipitation, Cloud Amount, and Surface Wind

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4162045
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJacks, Eli
    contributor authorBower, J. Brent
    contributor authorDagostaro, Valery J.
    contributor authorDallavalle, J. Paul
    contributor authorErickson, Mary C.
    contributor authorSu, James C.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:43:31Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:43:31Z
    date copyright1990/03/01
    date issued1990
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-2528.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4162045
    description abstractIn this paper, we describe the development and use of new nested grid model (NGM)-based model output statistics (MOS) guidance that has been available since 26 July 1989 for 204 stations in the contiguous United States. The new guidance, which replaced the NGM-based perfect prog package that had been operational since May 1987, consists of forecasts of max/min temperature, probability of precipitation, cloud amount, and surface wind. Guidance for all four elements is available for projections of 1 and 2 days from 0000 and 1200 UTC. The limited-area fine-mesh model (LFM)-based MOS guidance package is still available and was not affected by this change. Verification on independent data shows that NGM-based MOS and LFM-based MOS temperature forecasts are about equally accurate and that both sets of MOS guidance are clearly superior to the NGM-based perfect prog guidance. For the probability of precipitation, the NGM-based MOS guidance is consistently more skillful than the perfect prog guidance, and usually more skillful than the LFM-based MOS guidance. For cloud amount, the NGM-based MOS forecasts are more skillful than either the LFM-based MOS or the NGM-based perfect prog. Finally, the NGM-based MOS and perfect prog wind forecasts are about equally skillful, and both sets are superior to the LFM-based MOS guidance.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleNew NGM-Based MOS Guidance for Maximum/Minimum Temperature, Probability of Precipitation, Cloud Amount, and Surface Wind
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume5
    journal issue1
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0434(1990)005<0128:NNBMGF>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage128
    journal lastpage138
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;1990:;volume( 005 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian