YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Weather and Forecasting
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Analysis of Expert Judgment in a Hail Forecasting Experiment

    Source: Weather and Forecasting:;1989:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 001::page 24
    Author:
    Stewart, Thomas R.
    ,
    Moninger, William R.
    ,
    Brady, Ray H.
    ,
    Merrem, Frank H.
    ,
    Stewart, Thomas R.
    ,
    Grassia, Janet
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004<0024:AOEJIA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This study compared meteorologists, an expert system, and simple weighted-sum models in a limited-information hail forecasting experiment. It was found that forecasts made by meteorologists were closely approximated by an additive model, and that the model captured most of their forecasting skill. Furthermore, the additive model approximated the meteorologists? forecasts better than the expert system did. Results of this study am consistent with the results of extensive psychological research on judgment and decision making processes. Potential implications are discussed.
    • Download: (891.7Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Analysis of Expert Judgment in a Hail Forecasting Experiment

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4161367
    Collections
    • Weather and Forecasting

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStewart, Thomas R.
    contributor authorMoninger, William R.
    contributor authorBrady, Ray H.
    contributor authorMerrem, Frank H.
    contributor authorStewart, Thomas R.
    contributor authorGrassia, Janet
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:41:46Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:41:46Z
    date copyright1989/03/01
    date issued1989
    identifier issn0882-8156
    identifier otherams-2467.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4161367
    description abstractThis study compared meteorologists, an expert system, and simple weighted-sum models in a limited-information hail forecasting experiment. It was found that forecasts made by meteorologists were closely approximated by an additive model, and that the model captured most of their forecasting skill. Furthermore, the additive model approximated the meteorologists? forecasts better than the expert system did. Results of this study am consistent with the results of extensive psychological research on judgment and decision making processes. Potential implications are discussed.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleAnalysis of Expert Judgment in a Hail Forecasting Experiment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume4
    journal issue1
    journal titleWeather and Forecasting
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004<0024:AOEJIA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage24
    journal lastpage34
    treeWeather and Forecasting:;1989:;volume( 004 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian