YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Radar Measurement of Rainfall—A Summary

    Source: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;1979:;volume( 060 ):;issue: 009::page 1048
    Author:
    Wilson, James W.
    ,
    Brandes, Edward A.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1979)060<1048:RMORS>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Radar can produce detailed precipitation information for large areas from a single location in real time. Although radar has been used experimentally for nearly 30 years to measure rainfall, operational implementation has been slow. Today we find that data are underutilized and both confusion and misunderstanding exist about the inherent ability of radar to measure rainfall, about factors that contribute to errors, and about the importance of careful calibration and signal processing. Areal and point rainfall estimates are often in error by a factor of two or more. Error sources reside in measurement of radar reflectivity factor, evaporation and advection of precipitation before reaching the ground, and variations in the drop-size distribution and vertical air motions. Nevertheless, radar can be of lifesaving usefulness by alerting forecasters to the potential for flash flooding. The most successful technique for improving the radar rainfall estimates has been to ?calibrate? the radar with rain gages. Simple techniques that combine sparse gage reports (one gage per 1000?2000 km2) with radar produce smaller measurement errors (10?30%) than either system alone. When high accuracy rainfall measurements are needed (average error less than about 10?20%) the advantage of radar is diminished, since the number of gages required for calibration is itself sufficient to provide the desired accuracy.
    • Download: (846.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Radar Measurement of Rainfall—A Summary

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4160541
    Collections
    • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWilson, James W.
    contributor authorBrandes, Edward A.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:39:50Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:39:50Z
    date copyright1979/09/01
    date issued1979
    identifier issn0003-0007
    identifier otherams-23926.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4160541
    description abstractRadar can produce detailed precipitation information for large areas from a single location in real time. Although radar has been used experimentally for nearly 30 years to measure rainfall, operational implementation has been slow. Today we find that data are underutilized and both confusion and misunderstanding exist about the inherent ability of radar to measure rainfall, about factors that contribute to errors, and about the importance of careful calibration and signal processing. Areal and point rainfall estimates are often in error by a factor of two or more. Error sources reside in measurement of radar reflectivity factor, evaporation and advection of precipitation before reaching the ground, and variations in the drop-size distribution and vertical air motions. Nevertheless, radar can be of lifesaving usefulness by alerting forecasters to the potential for flash flooding. The most successful technique for improving the radar rainfall estimates has been to ?calibrate? the radar with rain gages. Simple techniques that combine sparse gage reports (one gage per 1000?2000 km2) with radar produce smaller measurement errors (10?30%) than either system alone. When high accuracy rainfall measurements are needed (average error less than about 10?20%) the advantage of radar is diminished, since the number of gages required for calibration is itself sufficient to provide the desired accuracy.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleRadar Measurement of Rainfall—A Summary
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume60
    journal issue9
    journal titleBulletin of the American Meteorological Society
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0477(1979)060<1048:RMORS>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1048
    journal lastpage1058
    treeBulletin of the American Meteorological Society:;1979:;volume( 060 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian