YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Evaluating Radial Current Measurements from CODAR High-Frequency Radars with Moored Current Meters

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2004:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 008::page 1259
    Author:
    Emery, Brian M.
    ,
    Washburn, Libe
    ,
    Harlan, Jack A.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<1259:ERCMFC>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The performance of a network of five CODAR (Coastal Ocean Dynamics Application Radar) SeaSonde high-frequency (HF) radars, broadcasting near 13 MHz and using the Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC) algorithm for direction finding, is described based on comparisons with an array of nine moorings in the Santa Barbara Channel and Santa Maria basin deployed between June 1997 and November 1999. Eight of the moorings carried vector-measuring current meters (VMCMs), the ninth had an upward-looking ADCP. Coverage areas of the HF radars and moorings included diverse flow and sea-state regimes. Measurement depths were ?1 m for the HF radars, 5 m for the VMCMs, and 3.2 m for the ADCP bin nearest to the surface. Comparison of radial current components from 18 HF radar?mooring pairs yielded rms speed differences of 7?19 cm s?1 and correlation coefficients squared (r2) in the range of 0.39?0.77. Spectral analysis showed significant coherence for frequencies below 0.1 cph (periods longer than 10 h). At higher frequencies no significant coherence was found, and noise levels corresponding to 6 cm s?1 rms were evident in the radar data. Errors in the radar bearing determination were found in 10 out of 18 comparisons, with a typical magnitude of 5°?10°, and a maximum of 19°. The effects of bearing errors on total vector currents were evaluated using a simple flow field and measured bearing errors, showing up to 15% errors in computed flow speeds, and up to ?9° errors in flow directions.
    • Download: (606.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Evaluating Radial Current Measurements from CODAR High-Frequency Radars with Moored Current Meters

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4160056
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorEmery, Brian M.
    contributor authorWashburn, Libe
    contributor authorHarlan, Jack A.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:38:47Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:38:47Z
    date copyright2004/08/01
    date issued2004
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-2349.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4160056
    description abstractThe performance of a network of five CODAR (Coastal Ocean Dynamics Application Radar) SeaSonde high-frequency (HF) radars, broadcasting near 13 MHz and using the Multiple Signal Classification (MUSIC) algorithm for direction finding, is described based on comparisons with an array of nine moorings in the Santa Barbara Channel and Santa Maria basin deployed between June 1997 and November 1999. Eight of the moorings carried vector-measuring current meters (VMCMs), the ninth had an upward-looking ADCP. Coverage areas of the HF radars and moorings included diverse flow and sea-state regimes. Measurement depths were ?1 m for the HF radars, 5 m for the VMCMs, and 3.2 m for the ADCP bin nearest to the surface. Comparison of radial current components from 18 HF radar?mooring pairs yielded rms speed differences of 7?19 cm s?1 and correlation coefficients squared (r2) in the range of 0.39?0.77. Spectral analysis showed significant coherence for frequencies below 0.1 cph (periods longer than 10 h). At higher frequencies no significant coherence was found, and noise levels corresponding to 6 cm s?1 rms were evident in the radar data. Errors in the radar bearing determination were found in 10 out of 18 comparisons, with a typical magnitude of 5°?10°, and a maximum of 19°. The effects of bearing errors on total vector currents were evaluated using a simple flow field and measured bearing errors, showing up to 15% errors in computed flow speeds, and up to ?9° errors in flow directions.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleEvaluating Radial Current Measurements from CODAR High-Frequency Radars with Moored Current Meters
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume21
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<1259:ERCMFC>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1259
    journal lastpage1271
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2004:;volume( 021 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian