YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Prognostic Equations for Cloud Fraction and Liquid Water, and Their Relation to Filtered Density Functions

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2004:;Volume( 061 ):;issue: 003::page 338
    Author:
    Larson, Vincent E.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0338:PEFCFA>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: This paper derives prognostic equations for cloud fraction and specific liquid water content. Such equations are carried by host models in order to provide more accurate forcing of microphysical and radiative parameterizations. The starting point of the derivations is a prognostic equation for the filtered density function (FDF) of a moisture variable. The FDF is the probability density function (PDF) of subgrid (i.e., filtered) fluctuations. The resulting equations for cloud fraction and liquid water contain unclosed terms. Many of these terms can be closed if the relevant joint FDF is known. In addition, there emerge from the derivation two dissipation terms that are not closed even if the FDF of moisture is known. These dissipation terms do not appear in equations for conserved variables such as total water content. The paper then compares various closures in the literature for turbulent flux, source, and dissipative mixing terms. Intuition suggests that dissipative mixing cannot usually increase liquid water content but that dissipative mixing can sometimes increase cloud fraction. The paper discusses two closures for dissipative mixing: one is based on the linear mean-square estimation (LMSE) model, and the other is due to Tiedtke. The LSME model permits cloud fraction to increase, as expected, but the Tiedtke model does not.
    • Download: (376.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Prognostic Equations for Cloud Fraction and Liquid Water, and Their Relation to Filtered Density Functions

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4159978
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorLarson, Vincent E.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:38:35Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:38:35Z
    date copyright2004/02/01
    date issued2004
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-23419.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4159978
    description abstractThis paper derives prognostic equations for cloud fraction and specific liquid water content. Such equations are carried by host models in order to provide more accurate forcing of microphysical and radiative parameterizations. The starting point of the derivations is a prognostic equation for the filtered density function (FDF) of a moisture variable. The FDF is the probability density function (PDF) of subgrid (i.e., filtered) fluctuations. The resulting equations for cloud fraction and liquid water contain unclosed terms. Many of these terms can be closed if the relevant joint FDF is known. In addition, there emerge from the derivation two dissipation terms that are not closed even if the FDF of moisture is known. These dissipation terms do not appear in equations for conserved variables such as total water content. The paper then compares various closures in the literature for turbulent flux, source, and dissipative mixing terms. Intuition suggests that dissipative mixing cannot usually increase liquid water content but that dissipative mixing can sometimes increase cloud fraction. The paper discusses two closures for dissipative mixing: one is based on the linear mean-square estimation (LMSE) model, and the other is due to Tiedtke. The LSME model permits cloud fraction to increase, as expected, but the Tiedtke model does not.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titlePrognostic Equations for Cloud Fraction and Liquid Water, and Their Relation to Filtered Density Functions
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume61
    journal issue3
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0338:PEFCFA>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage338
    journal lastpage351
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2004:;Volume( 061 ):;issue: 003
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian