YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comments on “Observations of a Mesoscale Ducted Gravity Wave”

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2000:;Volume( 057 ):;issue: 004::page 595
    Author:
    Browning, G. L.
    ,
    Kreiss, H-O.
    ,
    van de Kamp, D. W.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0595:COOOAM>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Recently, a mathematical theory has been developed that proves that there are two main components of the solution of the forced dynamical system that describes a mesoscale storm driven by cooling and heating processes. The component that contains most of the energy of the solution (and is therefore called the dominant component) satisfies a simple nonlinear system devoid of gravity and sound waves. The residual component of the solution satisfies a forced gravity wave equation and essentially does not interact with the dominant component. The mathematical theory also provides information about the amplitude, wavelength, and period of the gravity waves. In the paper entitled ?Comments on ?Use of ducting theory in an observed case of gravity waves,?? Dr. F. M. Ralph has claimed that the new gravity wave theory is not consistent with profiler observations of vertical velocity in his earlier paper entitled ?Observations of a mesoscale ducted gravity wave.? Here it is shown that the new theory is completely consistent with profilers that have documented error bounds on the vertical velocity measurements. In the case that the new theory is claimed to be inconsistent with observational data, the data were obtained from a profiler with undocumented accuracy of the vertical velocity measurements in the precipitating case, and the two components of the solution were not properly separated.
    • Download: (47.11Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comments on “Observations of a Mesoscale Ducted Gravity Wave”

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4159008
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBrowning, G. L.
    contributor authorKreiss, H-O.
    contributor authorvan de Kamp, D. W.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:36:00Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:36:00Z
    date copyright2000/02/01
    date issued2000
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-22546.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4159008
    description abstractRecently, a mathematical theory has been developed that proves that there are two main components of the solution of the forced dynamical system that describes a mesoscale storm driven by cooling and heating processes. The component that contains most of the energy of the solution (and is therefore called the dominant component) satisfies a simple nonlinear system devoid of gravity and sound waves. The residual component of the solution satisfies a forced gravity wave equation and essentially does not interact with the dominant component. The mathematical theory also provides information about the amplitude, wavelength, and period of the gravity waves. In the paper entitled ?Comments on ?Use of ducting theory in an observed case of gravity waves,?? Dr. F. M. Ralph has claimed that the new gravity wave theory is not consistent with profiler observations of vertical velocity in his earlier paper entitled ?Observations of a mesoscale ducted gravity wave.? Here it is shown that the new theory is completely consistent with profilers that have documented error bounds on the vertical velocity measurements. In the case that the new theory is claimed to be inconsistent with observational data, the data were obtained from a profiler with undocumented accuracy of the vertical velocity measurements in the precipitating case, and the two components of the solution were not properly separated.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComments on “Observations of a Mesoscale Ducted Gravity Wave”
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume57
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0595:COOOAM>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage595
    journal lastpage598
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;2000:;Volume( 057 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian