YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Understanding the Seasonality of Orographically Forced Stationary Waves: Interaction between Mechanical and Thermal Forcing

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1999:;Volume( 056 ):;issue: 009::page 1154
    Author:
    Ringler, Todd D.
    ,
    Cook, Kerry H.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1154:UTSOOF>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Idealized simulations of the atmosphere?s stationary response to the Rockies, Tibetan Plateau, and the Greenland Ice Sheet are made using a nonlinear, quasigeostrophic model and are compared to observations. Observational data indicate low-level heating (cooling) occurs above the Rockies and Tibet in the summer (winter). Low-level cooling is found above Greenland in both seasons. The atmosphere responds to both diabatic heating (termed thermal forcing) and low-level flow being obstructed by the mountain?s presence (termed mechanical forcing). The response to thermal and mechanical forcing together can be very different from the response to either forcing individually. The presence of modest low-level heating or cooling (±1.5 K day?1) causes significant changes to the mechanical forcing and, thereby, to the stationary wave response. For example, while the nonlinear response to mechanical forcing and low-level heating is characterized by a cyclone over the orography, the response to mechanical forcing and low-level cooling consists of an anticyclone over the orography. These differences cannot be fully explained using linear theory. The presence of heating (cooling) tends to reduce (amplify) both the mechanical forcing and the far-field stationary wave response. In addition, the presence of low-level heating or cooling lowers the critical mountain height below which the response is essentially linear;including nonlinear temperature advection at the surface is especially important for obtaining an accurate response.
    • Download: (1.143Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Understanding the Seasonality of Orographically Forced Stationary Waves: Interaction between Mechanical and Thermal Forcing

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4158749
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRingler, Todd D.
    contributor authorCook, Kerry H.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:35:23Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:35:23Z
    date copyright1999/05/01
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-22312.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4158749
    description abstractIdealized simulations of the atmosphere?s stationary response to the Rockies, Tibetan Plateau, and the Greenland Ice Sheet are made using a nonlinear, quasigeostrophic model and are compared to observations. Observational data indicate low-level heating (cooling) occurs above the Rockies and Tibet in the summer (winter). Low-level cooling is found above Greenland in both seasons. The atmosphere responds to both diabatic heating (termed thermal forcing) and low-level flow being obstructed by the mountain?s presence (termed mechanical forcing). The response to thermal and mechanical forcing together can be very different from the response to either forcing individually. The presence of modest low-level heating or cooling (±1.5 K day?1) causes significant changes to the mechanical forcing and, thereby, to the stationary wave response. For example, while the nonlinear response to mechanical forcing and low-level heating is characterized by a cyclone over the orography, the response to mechanical forcing and low-level cooling consists of an anticyclone over the orography. These differences cannot be fully explained using linear theory. The presence of heating (cooling) tends to reduce (amplify) both the mechanical forcing and the far-field stationary wave response. In addition, the presence of low-level heating or cooling lowers the critical mountain height below which the response is essentially linear;including nonlinear temperature advection at the surface is especially important for obtaining an accurate response.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleUnderstanding the Seasonality of Orographically Forced Stationary Waves: Interaction between Mechanical and Thermal Forcing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume56
    journal issue9
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1154:UTSOOF>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1154
    journal lastpage1174
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1999:;Volume( 056 ):;issue: 009
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian