YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Liquid Water Path and Plane-Parallel Albedo Bias during ASTEX

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1995:;Volume( 052 ):;issue: 016::page 3002
    Author:
    Cahalan, Robert F.
    ,
    Silberstein, David
    ,
    Snider, Jack B.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3002:LWPAPP>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Inhomogeneous distributions of liquid water like those observed in real clouds generally reflect less solar radiation than idealized uniform distributions assumed in plane-parallel theory. Here the authors determine cloud reflectivity and the associated plane-parallel albedo bias from distributions of liquid water path derived from 28 days of microwave radiometer measurements obtained on Porto Santo Island in the Madeiras during June 1992 as part of the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment (ASTEX). The distributions are determined for each hour of the day, both for composites of the full act of 28 days and for a subset of 8 days having a high fraction of relatively thick cloud. Both sets are compared with results obtained from California stratocumulus during FM [First ISCCP (International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project) Regional Experiment]. In FIRE the albedo bin was dominated by variability of the cloud optical depth, as measured by a fractal parameter, 0≤ f 0 ≤ 1, while the ASTEX results are more complex. Mean cloud fraction above a 10 g m?1 threshold is about 50% in the 28-day set, compared to 76% in the 8-day subset and 82% in FIRE. Cloud fraction is sensitive to the threshold for the 28 ASTEX days, probably due to a large fraction of thin cloud below the threshold, but this is not the case for the 8-day subset or for FIRE. Clear fractions during ASTEX are generally of shorter duration than those in FIRE, as are those in the 8-day subset. The diurnal mean fractal parameter is about 0.6 in ASTEX compared to 0.5 in FIRE, while the 8-day subset has nearly the same mean but a wider range. The diurnal cycle in cloud albedo mid and albedo bias is computed from the cloud parameters for both sets, assuming zero clear-sky albedo. The total absolute albedo bias rises to values above 0.3 at sunrise and sunset, but since there is little incident energy at that time, the reflected flux is more affected by the midday bias. The total albedo bias has a 10OO LST maximum of about 0.3, largely due to a cloud fraction contribution of 0.2, absent in FIRE because in that case cloud frontier remains near 100% until after 1000 LST. The albedo bias has a second maximum of about 0.2 at noon, again mainly from cloud fraction and then drops to a minimum of about 0.1 at 1400 LST, when cloud fraction and fractal structure contribute about equally. Finally, a third maximum due to cloud fraction occurs at 1600 LST. In the, 8-day subset the 1000 LST maximum becomes dominated by the frontal structure, since the cloud fraction remains near 100% until 1000 LST, as in FIRE. The noon maximum receives roughly equal contributions, while the 1400 LST minimum bias is mainly due to fractal structure. Finally, the 1600 LST maximum and the evening limb bias are similar to those of the full 28-day set. These results show lids cloud fractal and radiative properties can vary considerably from one site and time to another mid at different times within the same site, as meterological conditions change.
    • Download: (922.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Liquid Water Path and Plane-Parallel Albedo Bias during ASTEX

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4157909
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorCahalan, Robert F.
    contributor authorSilberstein, David
    contributor authorSnider, Jack B.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:33:20Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:33:20Z
    date copyright1995/08/01
    date issued1995
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-21557.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4157909
    description abstractInhomogeneous distributions of liquid water like those observed in real clouds generally reflect less solar radiation than idealized uniform distributions assumed in plane-parallel theory. Here the authors determine cloud reflectivity and the associated plane-parallel albedo bias from distributions of liquid water path derived from 28 days of microwave radiometer measurements obtained on Porto Santo Island in the Madeiras during June 1992 as part of the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment (ASTEX). The distributions are determined for each hour of the day, both for composites of the full act of 28 days and for a subset of 8 days having a high fraction of relatively thick cloud. Both sets are compared with results obtained from California stratocumulus during FM [First ISCCP (International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project) Regional Experiment]. In FIRE the albedo bin was dominated by variability of the cloud optical depth, as measured by a fractal parameter, 0≤ f 0 ≤ 1, while the ASTEX results are more complex. Mean cloud fraction above a 10 g m?1 threshold is about 50% in the 28-day set, compared to 76% in the 8-day subset and 82% in FIRE. Cloud fraction is sensitive to the threshold for the 28 ASTEX days, probably due to a large fraction of thin cloud below the threshold, but this is not the case for the 8-day subset or for FIRE. Clear fractions during ASTEX are generally of shorter duration than those in FIRE, as are those in the 8-day subset. The diurnal mean fractal parameter is about 0.6 in ASTEX compared to 0.5 in FIRE, while the 8-day subset has nearly the same mean but a wider range. The diurnal cycle in cloud albedo mid and albedo bias is computed from the cloud parameters for both sets, assuming zero clear-sky albedo. The total absolute albedo bias rises to values above 0.3 at sunrise and sunset, but since there is little incident energy at that time, the reflected flux is more affected by the midday bias. The total albedo bias has a 10OO LST maximum of about 0.3, largely due to a cloud fraction contribution of 0.2, absent in FIRE because in that case cloud frontier remains near 100% until after 1000 LST. The albedo bias has a second maximum of about 0.2 at noon, again mainly from cloud fraction and then drops to a minimum of about 0.1 at 1400 LST, when cloud fraction and fractal structure contribute about equally. Finally, a third maximum due to cloud fraction occurs at 1600 LST. In the, 8-day subset the 1000 LST maximum becomes dominated by the frontal structure, since the cloud fraction remains near 100% until 1000 LST, as in FIRE. The noon maximum receives roughly equal contributions, while the 1400 LST minimum bias is mainly due to fractal structure. Finally, the 1600 LST maximum and the evening limb bias are similar to those of the full 28-day set. These results show lids cloud fractal and radiative properties can vary considerably from one site and time to another mid at different times within the same site, as meterological conditions change.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleLiquid Water Path and Plane-Parallel Albedo Bias during ASTEX
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume52
    journal issue16
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1995)052<3002:LWPAPP>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage3002
    journal lastpage3012
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1995:;Volume( 052 ):;issue: 016
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian