YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Intercomparison of NDSC Ground-Based Solar FTIR Measurements of Atmospheric Gases at Lauder, New Zealand

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2003:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 008::page 1138
    Author:
    Griffith, D. W. T.
    ,
    Jones, N. B.
    ,
    McNamara, B.
    ,
    Walsh, C. Paton
    ,
    Bell, W.
    ,
    Bernardo, C.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1138:IONGSF>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: A formal intercomparison of atmospheric total column measurements of N2O, N2, CH4, O3, HCl, HNO3, and HF by two ground-based solar Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers conducted as part of the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change (NDSC) instrument certification procedure at Lauder, New Zealand, is presented. The two instruments were nominally very similar, collocated, and collected data at the same times. Collected spectra were analyzed independently by the individual operators in a blind-phase intercomparison, then reanalyzed by a single operator using identical analysis methods to eliminate any potential bias from the spectral analysis. From the consistent reanalysis, gases with predominantly tropospheric distributions and pressure-broadened spectral lines, such as N2O and CH4, showed differences between retrieved columns of typically less than 1%. For predominantly stratospheric gases, such as HCl and O3, differences were less than 3%. In most cases, the differences were greater than the scatter in the individual measurements and were significant at the 95% confidence level. The worst case observed was for HF, which showed a 7% systematic bias between instruments. The differences are consistent in magnitude with those expected for known types of imperfection in spectrometer alignment and operation, but attempts to quantify these effects through instrument line shape analysis, phase error, zero offsets, and channel spectra did not remove the apparent differences.
    • Download: (479.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Intercomparison of NDSC Ground-Based Solar FTIR Measurements of Atmospheric Gases at Lauder, New Zealand

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4157890
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGriffith, D. W. T.
    contributor authorJones, N. B.
    contributor authorMcNamara, B.
    contributor authorWalsh, C. Paton
    contributor authorBell, W.
    contributor authorBernardo, C.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:33:16Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:33:16Z
    date copyright2003/08/01
    date issued2003
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-2154.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4157890
    description abstractA formal intercomparison of atmospheric total column measurements of N2O, N2, CH4, O3, HCl, HNO3, and HF by two ground-based solar Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers conducted as part of the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change (NDSC) instrument certification procedure at Lauder, New Zealand, is presented. The two instruments were nominally very similar, collocated, and collected data at the same times. Collected spectra were analyzed independently by the individual operators in a blind-phase intercomparison, then reanalyzed by a single operator using identical analysis methods to eliminate any potential bias from the spectral analysis. From the consistent reanalysis, gases with predominantly tropospheric distributions and pressure-broadened spectral lines, such as N2O and CH4, showed differences between retrieved columns of typically less than 1%. For predominantly stratospheric gases, such as HCl and O3, differences were less than 3%. In most cases, the differences were greater than the scatter in the individual measurements and were significant at the 95% confidence level. The worst case observed was for HF, which showed a 7% systematic bias between instruments. The differences are consistent in magnitude with those expected for known types of imperfection in spectrometer alignment and operation, but attempts to quantify these effects through instrument line shape analysis, phase error, zero offsets, and channel spectra did not remove the apparent differences.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleIntercomparison of NDSC Ground-Based Solar FTIR Measurements of Atmospheric Gases at Lauder, New Zealand
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume20
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1138:IONGSF>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1138
    journal lastpage1153
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2003:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian