| contributor author | Zhu, Xun | |
| contributor author | Arking, Albert | |
| date accessioned | 2017-06-09T14:32:40Z | |
| date available | 2017-06-09T14:32:40Z | |
| date copyright | 1994/12/01 | |
| date issued | 1994 | |
| identifier issn | 0022-4928 | |
| identifier other | ams-21334.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4157662 | |
| description abstract | This paper compares accuracy for the daily averaged reflection, transmission, and absorption of solar flux derived from the delta-four-stream approximation and a few selected two-stream approximations. In the chosen variety of two-stream approximations, a two-stream approximation suggested by Zhu produces the most accurate reflection and transmission for conservative scattering with optical thickness τ1 < 3. Otherwise, the delta?Eddinton approximation is superior to other two-stream approximations. The delta-four-stream approximation produces errors that are smaller than the delta-Eddington approximation by at least a factor of 2. | |
| publisher | American Meteorological Society | |
| title | Comparison of Daily Averaged Reflection, Transmission, and Absorption for Selected Radiative Flux Transfer Approximations | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 51 | |
| journal issue | 24 | |
| journal title | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | |
| identifier doi | 10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<3580:CODART>2.0.CO;2 | |
| journal fristpage | 3580 | |
| journal lastpage | 3592 | |
| tree | Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1994:;Volume( 051 ):;issue: 024 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext | |