YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparisons of Airborne CVI and FSSP Measurements of Cloud Droplet Number Concentrations in Marine Stratocumulus Clouds

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2003:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 001::page 133
    Author:
    Glantz, Paul
    ,
    Noone, Kevin J.
    ,
    Osborne, Simon R.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0133:COACAF>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Comparisons of counterflow virtual impactor (CVI) and forward scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP) measurements of cloud droplet number concentrations obtained by two different aircraft in marine boundary layer stratocumulus clouds are presented. The cut sizes of the CVIs have been calculated using a mathematical model (DLH50) and using Stokes' theory (DS50). For most of the cases the agreement between DLH50 and DS50 is within 3%. Based on the results obtained with the mathematical model the agreement between CVI and FSSP concentrations is within 25% for most of the cases analyzed in this study and also within 10% for several of the cases. The reasonable agreement between CVI and FSSP concentrations supports the assumption that a droplet releases a single residual particle upon evaporation. Furthermore, in this study it is shown that droplet shattering can qualitatively be identified and it occurs often when there are elevated concentrations of drizzle droplets in the clouds. Poor agreement between the CVI and FSSP was found in a few instances. For one of these cases the discrepancy obtained between the CVI and FSSP seems to have been caused by losses in the CVI mainly by cloud droplets with larger sizes.
    • Download: (817.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Comparisons of Airborne CVI and FSSP Measurements of Cloud Droplet Number Concentrations in Marine Stratocumulus Clouds

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4157435
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorGlantz, Paul
    contributor authorNoone, Kevin J.
    contributor authorOsborne, Simon R.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:32:04Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:32:04Z
    date copyright2003/01/01
    date issued2003
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-2113.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4157435
    description abstractComparisons of counterflow virtual impactor (CVI) and forward scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP) measurements of cloud droplet number concentrations obtained by two different aircraft in marine boundary layer stratocumulus clouds are presented. The cut sizes of the CVIs have been calculated using a mathematical model (DLH50) and using Stokes' theory (DS50). For most of the cases the agreement between DLH50 and DS50 is within 3%. Based on the results obtained with the mathematical model the agreement between CVI and FSSP concentrations is within 25% for most of the cases analyzed in this study and also within 10% for several of the cases. The reasonable agreement between CVI and FSSP concentrations supports the assumption that a droplet releases a single residual particle upon evaporation. Furthermore, in this study it is shown that droplet shattering can qualitatively be identified and it occurs often when there are elevated concentrations of drizzle droplets in the clouds. Poor agreement between the CVI and FSSP was found in a few instances. For one of these cases the discrepancy obtained between the CVI and FSSP seems to have been caused by losses in the CVI mainly by cloud droplets with larger sizes.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComparisons of Airborne CVI and FSSP Measurements of Cloud Droplet Number Concentrations in Marine Stratocumulus Clouds
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume20
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0133:COACAF>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage133
    journal lastpage142
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2003:;volume( 020 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian