YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Composite Structure of Plumes in Stratus-topped Boundary Layers

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1991:;Volume( 048 ):;issue: 020::page 2280
    Author:
    Moeng, Chin-Hoh
    ,
    Schumann, Ulrich
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<2280:CSOPIS>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Knowledge of convective plumes within the clear convective boundary layer (CBL) is quite advanced owing to direct measurements, tank experiments, and large-eddy simulation studies. As a result, modeling of the CBL is relatively successful. Progress for the stratus-topped boundary layer (STBL), however, is slow. This study compares the plume structure of the surface-heated CBL with that of the cloud-top-cooled STBL in the hope of extending our knowledge of the CBL to the STBL. A conditional sampling technique is applied to the STBL flow fields that are generated through large-simulations, so that the structures of typical updrafts and downdrafts may be derived. For the purpose of comparing the surface-heated CBL and the cloud-top-cooled STBL, an idealized STBL is simulated where the turbulence is maintained solely by cloud-top radiative cooling. The principal difference between the CBL and this idealized STBL lies in the origin of the plumes: primary plumes in the CBL are generated at a rigid surface, while those in the STBL are generated at the entraining interface. It was found that in the idealized STBL, the compensating updrafts are nearly as strong as the top-cooling-generated downdrafts, and they contribute a significant amount to the heat, moisture, and momentum transports. This differs very much from the CBL, where the compensating downdrafts are much weaker than the surface-heating-generated updrafts and contribute much less to the transports. The mechanism that results in such an asymmetry between the CBL and STBL is examined, and suggestions on how the asymmetry affects the entrainment process are made.
    • Download: (1.027Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Composite Structure of Plumes in Stratus-topped Boundary Layers

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4156860
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMoeng, Chin-Hoh
    contributor authorSchumann, Ulrich
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:30:34Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:30:34Z
    date copyright1991/10/01
    date issued1991
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-20612.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4156860
    description abstractKnowledge of convective plumes within the clear convective boundary layer (CBL) is quite advanced owing to direct measurements, tank experiments, and large-eddy simulation studies. As a result, modeling of the CBL is relatively successful. Progress for the stratus-topped boundary layer (STBL), however, is slow. This study compares the plume structure of the surface-heated CBL with that of the cloud-top-cooled STBL in the hope of extending our knowledge of the CBL to the STBL. A conditional sampling technique is applied to the STBL flow fields that are generated through large-simulations, so that the structures of typical updrafts and downdrafts may be derived. For the purpose of comparing the surface-heated CBL and the cloud-top-cooled STBL, an idealized STBL is simulated where the turbulence is maintained solely by cloud-top radiative cooling. The principal difference between the CBL and this idealized STBL lies in the origin of the plumes: primary plumes in the CBL are generated at a rigid surface, while those in the STBL are generated at the entraining interface. It was found that in the idealized STBL, the compensating updrafts are nearly as strong as the top-cooling-generated downdrafts, and they contribute a significant amount to the heat, moisture, and momentum transports. This differs very much from the CBL, where the compensating downdrafts are much weaker than the surface-heating-generated updrafts and contribute much less to the transports. The mechanism that results in such an asymmetry between the CBL and STBL is examined, and suggestions on how the asymmetry affects the entrainment process are made.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleComposite Structure of Plumes in Stratus-topped Boundary Layers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume48
    journal issue20
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<2280:CSOPIS>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage2280
    journal lastpage2291
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1991:;Volume( 048 ):;issue: 020
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian