YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Errors for Space-Based Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements: Definition, Performance, and Verification

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 011::page 1749
    Author:
    Frehlich, Rod
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1749:EFSBDL>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Verification of space-based wind measurements will be difficult because of the random variations of the atmospheric velocity field over the measurement volume. The definition of accuracy requires a definition of ?truth.? For this work, truth is defined as the spatial average of the random velocity over the measurement volume. The bias of space-based velocity measurements is dominated by the pointing errors of the lidar beam. The bias and random errors of Doppler lidar measurements produced by the estimation algorithm and the random atmospheric parameters are determined with computer simulations for both the sampling errors of the lidar scanning pattern and the estimation error of the radial velocity measurements. The results are compared with the error produced by ideal rawinsonde measurements and aircraft winds. A simple method to verify the random error of Doppler lidar radial velocity measurements using only multiple-shot lidar data (no in situ data are required) is compared with results from computer simulation. The verification of space-based measurements using the correlation between rawinsonde measurements and aircraft winds is also investigated for typical tropospheric conditions. For coherent Doppler lidar, the random errors are dominated by the sampling or representative errors produced by the scanning geometry of the lidar beam. The instrumental random error is typically less than the sampling error.
    • Download: (307.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Errors for Space-Based Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements: Definition, Performance, and Verification

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4155312
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorFrehlich, Rod
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:26:11Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:26:11Z
    date copyright2001/11/01
    date issued2001
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-1922.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4155312
    description abstractVerification of space-based wind measurements will be difficult because of the random variations of the atmospheric velocity field over the measurement volume. The definition of accuracy requires a definition of ?truth.? For this work, truth is defined as the spatial average of the random velocity over the measurement volume. The bias of space-based velocity measurements is dominated by the pointing errors of the lidar beam. The bias and random errors of Doppler lidar measurements produced by the estimation algorithm and the random atmospheric parameters are determined with computer simulations for both the sampling errors of the lidar scanning pattern and the estimation error of the radial velocity measurements. The results are compared with the error produced by ideal rawinsonde measurements and aircraft winds. A simple method to verify the random error of Doppler lidar radial velocity measurements using only multiple-shot lidar data (no in situ data are required) is compared with results from computer simulation. The verification of space-based measurements using the correlation between rawinsonde measurements and aircraft winds is also investigated for typical tropospheric conditions. For coherent Doppler lidar, the random errors are dominated by the sampling or representative errors produced by the scanning geometry of the lidar beam. The instrumental random error is typically less than the sampling error.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleErrors for Space-Based Doppler Lidar Wind Measurements: Definition, Performance, and Verification
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume18
    journal issue11
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1749:EFSBDL>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1749
    journal lastpage1772
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 011
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian