YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Transilient Turbulence Theory. Part III: Bulk Dispersion Rate and Numerical Stability

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1986:;Volume( 043 ):;issue: 001::page 50
    Author:
    Stull, Roland B.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0050:TTTPIB>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Even though a continuum of mixing parameters ?(t, z, ?) is used in transilient turbulence theory to describe the effects of many superimposed eddy sizes (?) on the mean field at height z, the overall bulk dispersive rate at any height can be measured by one number, N2(z). By utilizing second moment measures of dispersion, it is shown theoretically, for various special cases that the variance of tract position, σs2, is given by σz2(z, t = N2(z)t, where N2(z) = ? ?2?(z, ?)d?. An analogous expression for N2(z) is derived for the discrete version of transilient theory, as can be used for grid point models. These bulk dispersive rates can easily be compared to eddy diffusivity, K(z), because the variance of tracer position for K theory is known to be σs2(z, t) = 2K(z)t. The discrete version of transilient turbulence theory is shown to be absolutely numerically stable, regardless of the timestep size or the grid point spacing. In addition, it is shown how the values of the discrete transilient coefficients are determined by two factors: 1) the physics governing the turbulence mixing, and 2) the nature of the discretization (i.e., size of timestep and grid spacing. Thus, it is possible to employ transilient turbulence theory for both the diffusive and boundary layer parameterizations in a large-scale numerical forecast model that, by operational necessity, has coarse grid spacing and large timesteps.
    • Download: (616.6Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Transilient Turbulence Theory. Part III: Bulk Dispersion Rate and Numerical Stability

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4155297
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorStull, Roland B.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:26:09Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:26:09Z
    date copyright1986/01/01
    date issued1986
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-19206.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4155297
    description abstractEven though a continuum of mixing parameters ?(t, z, ?) is used in transilient turbulence theory to describe the effects of many superimposed eddy sizes (?) on the mean field at height z, the overall bulk dispersive rate at any height can be measured by one number, N2(z). By utilizing second moment measures of dispersion, it is shown theoretically, for various special cases that the variance of tract position, σs2, is given by σz2(z, t = N2(z)t, where N2(z) = ? ?2?(z, ?)d?. An analogous expression for N2(z) is derived for the discrete version of transilient theory, as can be used for grid point models. These bulk dispersive rates can easily be compared to eddy diffusivity, K(z), because the variance of tracer position for K theory is known to be σs2(z, t) = 2K(z)t. The discrete version of transilient turbulence theory is shown to be absolutely numerically stable, regardless of the timestep size or the grid point spacing. In addition, it is shown how the values of the discrete transilient coefficients are determined by two factors: 1) the physics governing the turbulence mixing, and 2) the nature of the discretization (i.e., size of timestep and grid spacing. Thus, it is possible to employ transilient turbulence theory for both the diffusive and boundary layer parameterizations in a large-scale numerical forecast model that, by operational necessity, has coarse grid spacing and large timesteps.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleTransilient Turbulence Theory. Part III: Bulk Dispersion Rate and Numerical Stability
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume43
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0050:TTTPIB>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage50
    journal lastpage57
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1986:;Volume( 043 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian