YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Long-Term Carbon Dioxide Fluxes from a Very Tall Tower in a Northern Forest: Flux Measurement Methodology

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 004::page 529
    Author:
    Berger, Bradford W.
    ,
    Davis, Kenneth J.
    ,
    Yi, Chuixiang
    ,
    Bakwin, Peter S.
    ,
    Zhao, Cong Long
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0529:LTCDFF>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Methodology for determining fluxes of CO2 and H2O vapor with the eddy-covariance method using data from instruments on a 447-m tower in the forest of northern Wisconsin is addressed. The primary goal of this study is the validation of the methods used to determine the net ecosystem exchange of CO2. Two-day least squares fits coupled with 30-day running averages limit calibration error of infrared gas analyzers for CO2 and H2O signals to ≈2%?3%. Sonic anemometers are aligned with local streamlines by fitting a sine function to tilt and wind direction averages, and fitting a third-order polynomial to the residual. Lag times are determined by selecting the peak in lagged covariance with an error of ≈1.5%?2% for CO2 and ≈1% for H2O vapor. Theory and a spectral fit method allow determination of the underestimation in CO2 flux (<5% daytime, <12% nighttime) and H2O vapor flux (<21%), which is due to spectral degradation induced by long air-sampling tubes. Scale analysis finds 0.5-h flux averaging periods are sufficient to measure all flux scales at 30-m height, but 1 h is necessary at higher levels, and random errors in the flux measurements due to limited sampling of atmospheric turbulence are fairly large (≈15%?20% for CO2 and ≈20%?40% for H2O vapor at lower levels for a 1-h period).
    • Download: (269.0Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Long-Term Carbon Dioxide Fluxes from a Very Tall Tower in a Northern Forest: Flux Measurement Methodology

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4154301
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBerger, Bradford W.
    contributor authorDavis, Kenneth J.
    contributor authorYi, Chuixiang
    contributor authorBakwin, Peter S.
    contributor authorZhao, Cong Long
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:22:54Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:22:54Z
    date copyright2001/04/01
    date issued2001
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-1831.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4154301
    description abstractMethodology for determining fluxes of CO2 and H2O vapor with the eddy-covariance method using data from instruments on a 447-m tower in the forest of northern Wisconsin is addressed. The primary goal of this study is the validation of the methods used to determine the net ecosystem exchange of CO2. Two-day least squares fits coupled with 30-day running averages limit calibration error of infrared gas analyzers for CO2 and H2O signals to ≈2%?3%. Sonic anemometers are aligned with local streamlines by fitting a sine function to tilt and wind direction averages, and fitting a third-order polynomial to the residual. Lag times are determined by selecting the peak in lagged covariance with an error of ≈1.5%?2% for CO2 and ≈1% for H2O vapor. Theory and a spectral fit method allow determination of the underestimation in CO2 flux (<5% daytime, <12% nighttime) and H2O vapor flux (<21%), which is due to spectral degradation induced by long air-sampling tubes. Scale analysis finds 0.5-h flux averaging periods are sufficient to measure all flux scales at 30-m height, but 1 h is necessary at higher levels, and random errors in the flux measurements due to limited sampling of atmospheric turbulence are fairly large (≈15%?20% for CO2 and ≈20%?40% for H2O vapor at lower levels for a 1-h period).
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleLong-Term Carbon Dioxide Fluxes from a Very Tall Tower in a Northern Forest: Flux Measurement Methodology
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume18
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0529:LTCDFF>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage529
    journal lastpage542
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;2001:;volume( 018 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian