YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers

    Source: Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1974:;Volume( 031 ):;issue: 007::page 1791
    Author:
    Mellor, George L.
    ,
    Yamada, Tetsuji
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1791:AHOTCM>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Turbulence models centered on hypotheses by Rotta and Kolmogoroff are complex. In the present paper we consider systematic simplifications based on the observation that parameters governing the degree of anisotropy are small. Hopefully, we shall discern a level of complexity which is intuitively attractive and which optimizes computational speed and convenience without unduly sacrificing accuracy. Discussion is focused on density stratified flow due to temperature. However, other dependent variables?such as water vapor and droplet density?can be treated in analogous fashion. It is, in fact, the anticipation of additional physical complexity in modeling turbulent flow fields that partially motivates the interest in an organized process of analytical simplification. For the problem of a planetary boundary layer subject to a diurnally varying surface heat flux or surface temperature, three models of varying complexity have been integrated for 10 days. All of the models incorporate identical empirical constants obtained from neutral flow data alone. The most complex of the three models requires simultaneous solution of 10 partial differential equations for turbulence moments in addition to the equations for the mean velocity components and temperature; the least complex eliminates all of the 10 differential equation whereas a ?compromise? model retains two differential equations for total turbulent energy and temperature variance. We conclude that all of the models give nearly the same results. We find the two-differential-equation model particularly attractive.
    • Download: (1.043Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4152460
    Collections
    • Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMellor, George L.
    contributor authorYamada, Tetsuji
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:17:44Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:17:44Z
    date copyright1974/10/01
    date issued1974
    identifier issn0022-4928
    identifier otherams-16653.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4152460
    description abstractTurbulence models centered on hypotheses by Rotta and Kolmogoroff are complex. In the present paper we consider systematic simplifications based on the observation that parameters governing the degree of anisotropy are small. Hopefully, we shall discern a level of complexity which is intuitively attractive and which optimizes computational speed and convenience without unduly sacrificing accuracy. Discussion is focused on density stratified flow due to temperature. However, other dependent variables?such as water vapor and droplet density?can be treated in analogous fashion. It is, in fact, the anticipation of additional physical complexity in modeling turbulent flow fields that partially motivates the interest in an organized process of analytical simplification. For the problem of a planetary boundary layer subject to a diurnally varying surface heat flux or surface temperature, three models of varying complexity have been integrated for 10 days. All of the models incorporate identical empirical constants obtained from neutral flow data alone. The most complex of the three models requires simultaneous solution of 10 partial differential equations for turbulence moments in addition to the equations for the mean velocity components and temperature; the least complex eliminates all of the 10 differential equation whereas a ?compromise? model retains two differential equations for total turbulent energy and temperature variance. We conclude that all of the models give nearly the same results. We find the two-differential-equation model particularly attractive.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Hierarchy of Turbulence Closure Models for Planetary Boundary Layers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume31
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<1791:AHOTCM>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1791
    journal lastpage1806
    treeJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences:;1974:;Volume( 031 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian