YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Rainfall Measurement Error by WSR-88D Radars due to Variations in Z–R Law Parameters and the Radar Constant

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1999:;volume( 016 ):;issue: 008::page 1017
    Author:
    Ulbrich, C. W.
    ,
    Lee, L. G.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<1017:RMEBWR>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: An investigation is made of the extent to which variations in Z?R (reflectivity factor?rainfall rate) relations can explain the systematically large offsets of radar-measured rainfall from rain gauge measurements as observed with some National Weather Service (NWS) WSR-88D radars. It is shown that theory predicts that the use by the NWS of the current default Z?R relation (Z = 300R1.4) should underestimate rainfall by about 25% in stratiform rain and overestimate it by about 33% in thunderstorm rain. Yet it is commonly observed that some WSR-88D radars systematically underestimate rainfall by a factor of 2 or more in stratiform rain and produce estimates of rainfall with acceptable accuracy for isolated thunderstorms. It is shown that variations in Z?R law parameters alone cannot explain these discrepancies, and it is proposed that their origin lies in a radar calibration offset. A comparison is made of reflectivity factors measured by the KGSP WSR-88D at Greer, South Carolina, with those determined from disdrometer measurements at the Clemson Atmospheric Research Laboratory. Comparisons for five storms find that the radar systematically underestimates the reflectivity factor by more than 3.5 dB. This offset of the radar-measured reflectivity factor below the disdrometer measurements accounts for the systematic factor of 2 underestimation for stratiform rain and the apparent acceptable accuracy for thunderstorms using the KGSP WSR-88D radar. The difference between the radar and disdrometer measurements of the reflectivity factor is interpreted as being due to a radar calibration offset. It is also proposed that the systematic differences observed with other WSR-88D radars may be the result of similar calibration offsets.
    • Download: (101.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Rainfall Measurement Error by WSR-88D Radars due to Variations in Z–R Law Parameters and the Radar Constant

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4151367
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorUlbrich, C. W.
    contributor authorLee, L. G.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:15:04Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:15:04Z
    date copyright1999/08/01
    date issued1999
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-1567.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4151367
    description abstractAn investigation is made of the extent to which variations in Z?R (reflectivity factor?rainfall rate) relations can explain the systematically large offsets of radar-measured rainfall from rain gauge measurements as observed with some National Weather Service (NWS) WSR-88D radars. It is shown that theory predicts that the use by the NWS of the current default Z?R relation (Z = 300R1.4) should underestimate rainfall by about 25% in stratiform rain and overestimate it by about 33% in thunderstorm rain. Yet it is commonly observed that some WSR-88D radars systematically underestimate rainfall by a factor of 2 or more in stratiform rain and produce estimates of rainfall with acceptable accuracy for isolated thunderstorms. It is shown that variations in Z?R law parameters alone cannot explain these discrepancies, and it is proposed that their origin lies in a radar calibration offset. A comparison is made of reflectivity factors measured by the KGSP WSR-88D at Greer, South Carolina, with those determined from disdrometer measurements at the Clemson Atmospheric Research Laboratory. Comparisons for five storms find that the radar systematically underestimates the reflectivity factor by more than 3.5 dB. This offset of the radar-measured reflectivity factor below the disdrometer measurements accounts for the systematic factor of 2 underestimation for stratiform rain and the apparent acceptable accuracy for thunderstorms using the KGSP WSR-88D radar. The difference between the radar and disdrometer measurements of the reflectivity factor is interpreted as being due to a radar calibration offset. It is also proposed that the systematic differences observed with other WSR-88D radars may be the result of similar calibration offsets.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleRainfall Measurement Error by WSR-88D Radars due to Variations in Z–R Law Parameters and the Radar Constant
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume16
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<1017:RMEBWR>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1017
    journal lastpage1024
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1999:;volume( 016 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian