YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Quantitative Comparison of Ground-Based FSSP and PVM Measurements

    Source: Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1998:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 004::page 887
    Author:
    Wendisch, M.
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0887:AQCOGB>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Cloud microphysical measurements of two ground-based field campaigns are analyzed in order to compare Particle Volume Monitor (PVM) measurements and Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP)-derived integrated quantities (mainly liquid water content LWC) for different types of drop size distributions. It is shown that in case of size distributions containing mostly small drops with diameters D < 25 ?m the PVM and FSSP measurements agree if respective data corrections (activity and changing VAR, Mie curve adjustment, and wind ramming) are applied to the FSSP raw data. Therefore, it is concluded that both PVM and FSSP are excellent microphysical sensors in continental, stratiform, or cumuliform clouds with mostly small drops. However, if low concentrations of large drops (D > 25 ?m) are present in the drop size distribution, which considerably increases LWC, discrepancies between PVM and FSSP measurements are established. The most likely explanation for the differences is that the sensitivity of the PVM decreases for low drop concentrations.
    • Download: (441.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      A Quantitative Comparison of Ground-Based FSSP and PVM Measurements

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4149779
    Collections
    • Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWendisch, M.
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:11:23Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:11:23Z
    date copyright1998/08/01
    date issued1998
    identifier issn0739-0572
    identifier otherams-1424.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4149779
    description abstractCloud microphysical measurements of two ground-based field campaigns are analyzed in order to compare Particle Volume Monitor (PVM) measurements and Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP)-derived integrated quantities (mainly liquid water content LWC) for different types of drop size distributions. It is shown that in case of size distributions containing mostly small drops with diameters D < 25 ?m the PVM and FSSP measurements agree if respective data corrections (activity and changing VAR, Mie curve adjustment, and wind ramming) are applied to the FSSP raw data. Therefore, it is concluded that both PVM and FSSP are excellent microphysical sensors in continental, stratiform, or cumuliform clouds with mostly small drops. However, if low concentrations of large drops (D > 25 ?m) are present in the drop size distribution, which considerably increases LWC, discrepancies between PVM and FSSP measurements are established. The most likely explanation for the differences is that the sensitivity of the PVM decreases for low drop concentrations.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleA Quantitative Comparison of Ground-Based FSSP and PVM Measurements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume15
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0887:AQCOGB>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage887
    journal lastpage900
    treeJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology:;1998:;volume( 015 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian