YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Three Methods to Determine Profiles of Reflectivity from Volumetric Radar Data to Correct Precipitation Estimates

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;2000:;volume( 039 ):;issue: 010::page 1715
    Author:
    Vignal, Bertrand
    ,
    Galli, Gianmario
    ,
    Joss, Jürg
    ,
    Germann, Urs
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450-39.10.1715
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: The vertical variability of radar reflectivity reduces the reliability of precipitation estimation by radar, especially in complex orography. This important source of error can, at least partially, be corrected for, if the vertical profile of radar reflectivity (VPR) is known. This work addresses three ways to determine VPR from volumetric radar data for correcting precipitation estimates. The first way uses a climatological profile. The second method, operational in Switzerland, takes the actual weather conditions into account: a mean profile is estimated directly from volumetric radar data collected close to the radar. The third way determines the identified profile, taking the variability of the VPRs in space into account. This approach yields local estimates of the profile (on areas of about 20 km ? 20 km) based on an inverse method. Two cases, a convective event and a stratiform event, are used to illustrate the three ways for determining the VPR, and the resulting improvement, verified with rain gauges. An enlarged dataset of nine cases shows that a correction based on a climatological profile already improves the accuracy of rain estimates by radar significantly: the fractional standard error (FSE) is reduced from the noncorrected 44% to 31%. By correcting with a single, mean profile (averaged over 1 h using real-time data), the FSE is further reduced from 31% to 25%. Last, the use of 70 locally identified profiles leads to best results (FSE = 23%). A higher improvement (lower FSE) is obtained for the stratiform rain event than for the convective case.
    • Download: (503.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Three Methods to Determine Profiles of Reflectivity from Volumetric Radar Data to Correct Precipitation Estimates

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148955
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorVignal, Bertrand
    contributor authorGalli, Gianmario
    contributor authorJoss, Jürg
    contributor authorGermann, Urs
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:09:31Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:09:31Z
    date copyright2000/10/01
    date issued2000
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-13499.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148955
    description abstractThe vertical variability of radar reflectivity reduces the reliability of precipitation estimation by radar, especially in complex orography. This important source of error can, at least partially, be corrected for, if the vertical profile of radar reflectivity (VPR) is known. This work addresses three ways to determine VPR from volumetric radar data for correcting precipitation estimates. The first way uses a climatological profile. The second method, operational in Switzerland, takes the actual weather conditions into account: a mean profile is estimated directly from volumetric radar data collected close to the radar. The third way determines the identified profile, taking the variability of the VPRs in space into account. This approach yields local estimates of the profile (on areas of about 20 km ? 20 km) based on an inverse method. Two cases, a convective event and a stratiform event, are used to illustrate the three ways for determining the VPR, and the resulting improvement, verified with rain gauges. An enlarged dataset of nine cases shows that a correction based on a climatological profile already improves the accuracy of rain estimates by radar significantly: the fractional standard error (FSE) is reduced from the noncorrected 44% to 31%. By correcting with a single, mean profile (averaged over 1 h using real-time data), the FSE is further reduced from 31% to 25%. Last, the use of 70 locally identified profiles leads to best results (FSE = 23%). A higher improvement (lower FSE) is obtained for the stratiform rain event than for the convective case.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleThree Methods to Determine Profiles of Reflectivity from Volumetric Radar Data to Correct Precipitation Estimates
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume39
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450-39.10.1715
    journal fristpage1715
    journal lastpage1726
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2000:;volume( 039 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian