YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • AMS
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Inversion Breakup in Small Rocky Mountain and Alpine Basins

    Source: Journal of Applied Meteorology:;2004:;volume( 043 ):;issue: 008::page 1069
    Author:
    Whiteman, C. David
    ,
    Pospichal, Bernhard
    ,
    Eisenbach, Stefan
    ,
    Weihs, Philipp
    ,
    Clements, Craig B.
    ,
    Steinacker, Reinhold
    ,
    Mursch-Radlgruber, Erich
    ,
    Dorninger, Manfred
    DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<1069:IBISRM>2.0.CO;2
    Publisher: American Meteorological Society
    Abstract: Comparisons are made between the postsunrise breakup of temperature inversions in two similar closed basins in very different climate settings, one in the eastern Alps and one in the Rocky Mountains. The small, high-altitude, limestone sinkholes have both experienced extreme temperature minima below ?50°C and both develop strong nighttime inversions. On undisturbed clear nights, temperature inversions reach to 120-m heights in both sinkholes but are much stronger in the drier Rocky Mountain basin (24 vs 13 K). Inversion destruction takes place 2.6?3 h after sunrise in these basins and is accomplished primarily by subsidence warming associated with the removal of air from the base of the inversion by the upslope flows that develop over heated sidewalls. A conceptual model of this destruction is presented, emphasizing the asymmetry of the boundary layer development around the basin and the effects of solar shading by the surrounding ridgeline. Differences in inversion strengths and postsunrise heating rates between the two basins are caused by differences in the surface energy budget, with drier soil and a higher sensible heat flux in the Rocky Mountain sinkhole. Inversions in the small basins break up more quickly following sunrise than for previously studied valleys. The pattern of inversion breakup in the non-snow-covered basins is the same as that reported in snow-covered Colorado valleys. The similar breakup patterns in valleys and basins suggest that along-valley wind systems play no role in the breakups, since the small basins have no along-valley wind system.
    • Download: (1.010Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Inversion Breakup in Small Rocky Mountain and Alpine Basins

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4148835
    Collections
    • Journal of Applied Meteorology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorWhiteman, C. David
    contributor authorPospichal, Bernhard
    contributor authorEisenbach, Stefan
    contributor authorWeihs, Philipp
    contributor authorClements, Craig B.
    contributor authorSteinacker, Reinhold
    contributor authorMursch-Radlgruber, Erich
    contributor authorDorninger, Manfred
    date accessioned2017-06-09T14:09:13Z
    date available2017-06-09T14:09:13Z
    date copyright2004/08/01
    date issued2004
    identifier issn0894-8763
    identifier otherams-13390.pdf
    identifier urihttp://onlinelibrary.yabesh.ir/handle/yetl/4148835
    description abstractComparisons are made between the postsunrise breakup of temperature inversions in two similar closed basins in very different climate settings, one in the eastern Alps and one in the Rocky Mountains. The small, high-altitude, limestone sinkholes have both experienced extreme temperature minima below ?50°C and both develop strong nighttime inversions. On undisturbed clear nights, temperature inversions reach to 120-m heights in both sinkholes but are much stronger in the drier Rocky Mountain basin (24 vs 13 K). Inversion destruction takes place 2.6?3 h after sunrise in these basins and is accomplished primarily by subsidence warming associated with the removal of air from the base of the inversion by the upslope flows that develop over heated sidewalls. A conceptual model of this destruction is presented, emphasizing the asymmetry of the boundary layer development around the basin and the effects of solar shading by the surrounding ridgeline. Differences in inversion strengths and postsunrise heating rates between the two basins are caused by differences in the surface energy budget, with drier soil and a higher sensible heat flux in the Rocky Mountain sinkhole. Inversions in the small basins break up more quickly following sunrise than for previously studied valleys. The pattern of inversion breakup in the non-snow-covered basins is the same as that reported in snow-covered Colorado valleys. The similar breakup patterns in valleys and basins suggest that along-valley wind systems play no role in the breakups, since the small basins have no along-valley wind system.
    publisherAmerican Meteorological Society
    titleInversion Breakup in Small Rocky Mountain and Alpine Basins
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume43
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Applied Meteorology
    identifier doi10.1175/1520-0450(2004)043<1069:IBISRM>2.0.CO;2
    journal fristpage1069
    journal lastpage1082
    treeJournal of Applied Meteorology:;2004:;volume( 043 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian